Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:47:01.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of oxygen content on flavour and chemical changes during aseptic storage of whole milk after ultra-high-temperature processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

E. L. Thomas
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
H. Burton
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
J. E. Ford
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
A. G. Perkin
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT

Summary

Indirectly heated ultra-high-temperature (UHT) processed milk was prepared with initially high, medium, and low dissolved O2 contents of 8·9, 3·6 and 1·0 ppm respectively, aseptically bottled, and tested at intervals during storage at room temperature for 150 d. Flavour acceptability increased to a maximum after a few days, but declined slowly after about 6 d; the increase was associated with less off-flavour described as ‘cabbagey’, and the decrease with more ‘stale’ off-flavour descriptions. Milks with higher initial O2 contents were preferred up to 8–13 d, but thereafter acceptability was independent of initial O2 content. Sulphydryl group (–SH) contents rapidly decreased and O2 levels correspondingly declined in the first few days as the flavour improved. Loss of –SH was lower with lower initial O2 contents, and moderate –SH content remained in low O2 samples for several weeks. Ferricyanide reducing (FR) values did not satisfactorily measure stale flavour development. They were initially high and decreased during the first 13 d at rates dependent on O2 content. After 20 d the FR values began to rise in high O2 samples, but continued to decline slowly in low O2 samples up to 90d although stale flavour was increasing.

High initial O2 contents resulted in rapid depletion of ascorbic acid and folic acid during storage. Losses of vitamin B12 were small, but were higher with high O2 contents than with low.

The beneficial effect of O2 on flavour, therefore, appears to be so slight and confined to such a short period in the early life of the milk as to be completely outweighed by the adverse nutritional effects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Public Health Association (1967). Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products, 12th ednWashington, D.C.: A.P.H.A.Google Scholar
Ashton, T. R. (1965). Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology 18, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, H. (1959). 15th International Dairy Congress, London 3, 1729.Google Scholar
Burton, H. & Perkin, A. G. (1970). Journal of Dairy Research 37, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, R. A. & McFarlane, W. D. (1945). Canadian Journal of Research 23B, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, R. P., Koncus, A. F., Cherrey, G. & Remaley, R. J. (1953). Journal of Milk and Food Technology 16, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulter, S. T. & Jenness, R. (1973). In Food dehydration, 2nd edn, vol. 2, Practices and applications, p. 290. (Eds Van Arsdel, W. B., Copley, M. J. and Morgan, A. I. Jr). Westport, Conn.: Avi Publ. Co.Google Scholar
Ford, J. E., Porter, J. W. G., Thompson, S. Y., Toothill, J. & Edwards-Webb, J. (1969). Journal of Dairy Research 36, 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, J. G., Underwood, H. M., Perkin, A. G. & Burton, H. (1970). Journal of Dairy Research 37, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hand, D. B., Guthrie, E. S. & Sharp, P. F. (1938). Science 87, 439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koka, M., Mikolajcik, E. M. & Gould, I. A. (1968). Journal of Dairy Science 51, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kon, S. K. & Watson, M. B. (1936). Biochemical Journal 30, 2273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R. L. J. (1964). Journal of Dairy Research 31, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, T. L. (1970). Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Patton, S. (1955). Journal of Dairy Science 38, 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E. L., Nielsen, A. J. & Olson, J. C. Jr (1955). American Milk Review 17(1), 50.Google Scholar
Toothill, J., Thompson, S. Y. & Edwards-Webb, J. (1970). Journal of Dairy Research 37, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadow, J. G. (1970). Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 25, 123.Google Scholar
Zadow, J. G. & Birtwistle, R. (1973). Journal of Dairy Research 40, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar