Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:20:04.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of manufacturing conditions on the setting rate of butter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

M. W. Taylor
Affiliation:
New Zealand Dairy Research Institute, Palmerston North, New Zealand
R. M. Dolby
Affiliation:
New Zealand Dairy Research Institute, Palmerston North, New Zealand
R. W. Russell
Affiliation:
New Zealand Dairy Research Institute, Palmerston North, New Zealand

Summary

The setting rate of butter during the first 5 h after manufacture was found to be increased by a higher maximum temperature during working, e.g. 15 as compared with 12·5 °C, or by a temporary rise in temperature to 18 °C for 30 min after working. A temporary lowering of temperature to 7 °C for 30 min, however, had no effect. The amount of working did not affect setting rate except where more prolonged working resulted in a higher final temperature in the butter.

When temperature conditions during and after working were standardized, it was found that temperature of pasteurization in either a Vacreator or plate pasteurizer or the presence of clumped fat in the cream had no effect on setting rate. The setting rate, however, was increased by Vacreator treatment as compared with plate pasteurization of cream or by low-pressure homogenization of cream after plate pasteurization.

Microscopic examination of butter samples showed much fewer intact fat globules in butter from Vacreator-treated or homogenized cream than in that from platepasteurized cream.

It is suggested that Vacreator treatment or homogenization of cream affect the setting rate of butter by causing changes in the fat-globule membrane which, in turn, influence the type of crystallization in the fat globules and the stability of the globules.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

deMan, J. M. & Wood, F. W. (1958 a). Journal of Dairy Science 41, 360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deMan, J. M. & Wood, F. W. (1958 b). Dairy Industries 23, 265.Google Scholar
deMan, J. M. & Wood, F. W. (1959). Journal of Dairy Science 42, 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolby, R. M. (1953). Journal of Dairy Research 20, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolby, R. M. (1957). Journal of Dairy Research 24, 372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolby, R. M. (1959). Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 14, 103.Google Scholar
Dolby, R. M. (1965). Journal of Dairy Research 32, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, N. (1947). Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 1, 19.Google Scholar
Mulder, H. (1949). 12th International Dairy Congress, Stockholm 2 (II), 81.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. W. & Dolby, R. M. (1970). 18th International Dairy Congress, Sydney 1E, 247.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. W., Dolby, R. M. & Russell, R. W. (1971). New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 6, 172.Google Scholar
Wood, F. W. & Dolby, R. M. (1965). Journal of Dairy Research 32, 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar