Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:34:00.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of loose house dairy cattle barn modification on udder health and production performance of Jersey crossbred cows in tropical lower Gangetic plains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2022

Dharma Sahu ,
Dilip Kumar Mandal  and
Monanki Podder
Dharma Sahu*
Affiliation:
Department of Livestock Production and Management, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute (Deemed University), Eastern Regional Station, Kalyani, West Bengal, India
Dilip Kumar Mandal
Affiliation:
Department of Livestock Production and Management, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute (Deemed University), Eastern Regional Station, Kalyani, West Bengal, India
Monanki Podder
Affiliation:
Department of Livestock Production Management, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
*
Author for correspondence: Dharma Sahu, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The results reported in this research communication aimed to reduce the housing discomfort and mastitis incidence of lactating Jersey crossbred cows through modifications to the roof and floor of loose housing stalls. The experiment was conducted on twenty Jersey crossbred cows and they were distributed equally into two different types of housing: (i) existing shed/control group (T0) – concrete floor and asbestos roof and (ii) modified shed/treatment group (T1)- sand flooring (4–6 inch deep; 38% of total area) and a thatch ceiling (4″ thick) under an asbestos roof. Under-roof surface temperature differed significantly (P < 0.01) between the two sheds during both the winter season but a greater difference was observed in the summer (modified sheds were 5–9 °C cooler than the control shed during peak hours (10 am to 3 pm) of the day. The milk yield (kg/d) in both seasons was significantly higher in the treatment group than in the control group (P < 0.01). The overall milk fat and total solid percentage were significantly higher in the treatment than the control group (P < 0.01) but solids not fat (SNF) did not show any difference between the groups. The percentage of milk fat did not differ significantly between the seasons, while the SNF and total solids were also significantly higher in the winter than the summer season (P < 0.01). There was a significantly lower subclinical mastitis test score (MCMT grade: P < 0.05) in the treatment group than in the control group. In the treatment group, the somatic cell count (SCC) was numerically but non-significantly less than in the control group. No differences in MCMT and SCC were observed between seasons (P > 0.05). It was concluded that the provision of sand as stall flooring and an under-roof thatch ceiling as a heat insulator was significantly associated with increased milk yield, milk composition and possibly, lower somatic cell count in dairy Jersey crossbred cows. However, since the study was limited to a single replicate of each housing system with analysis done at individual cow level, further work is needed to confirm these conclusions.

Keywords

Housing modificationsJersey crossbred cowsmilk yieldsand floorthatch ceilingudder health
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 89 , Issue 4 , November 2022 , pp. 392 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hannah Dairy Research Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bhakat, C, Chatterjee, A, Mandal, DK, Karunakaran, M, Mandal, A, Garai, S and Dutta, TK (2017) Milking management practices and IMI in Jersey crossbred cows in changing scenario. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 87, 95–100.Google Scholar
Bharambe, VY, Patil, SM and Burte, RG (2013) Performance of lactating crossbred cows under different housing systems during summer in Konkan agro-ecological conditions. Journal of Animal Research 3, 197–201.Google Scholar
Calamari, L, Calegari, F and Stefanini, L (2009) Effect of different free stall surfaces on behavioural, productive and metabolic parameters in dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 120, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devi, BK (1989) Studies on subclinical mastitis in cows with special references to incidence, etiology, sensitivity and treatment in Malwa region of Madhya Pradesh (MVSc and AH Thesis). JNKVV, Jabalpur, India.Google Scholar
Elbers, ARW, Miltenburg, JD, De Lange, D, Crauwels, APP, Barkema, HW and Schukken, YH (1998) Risk factors for clinical mastitis in a random sample of dairy herds from the southern part of the Netherlands. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 420–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geishauser, T, Querengasser, K, Nitschke, M and Sorbiraj, A (1999) Milk yield, somatic cell counts, and risk of removal from the herd for dairy cows after covered teat canal injury. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 1482–1488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hultgren, J and Bergsten, C (2001) Effects of a rubber-slatted flooring system on cleanliness and foot health in tied dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 52, 75–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ISO/R 488 (1983) Butyrometers for the Determination of the Fat Content of Milk by Gerbers Method. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organisation for Standardization.Google Scholar
Kadzere, CT, Murphy, MR, Silanikove, N and Maltz, E (2002) Heat stress in lactating dairy cows: a review. Livestock Production Science 77, 59–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandal, DK, Sahu, D, Mandal, A, Chatterjee, A, Bhakat, C, Rai, S, Karunakaran, M and Dutta, TK (2018) Alteration of micro-environment of animal shed through roof insulation by paddy straw – its seasonal efficacy and physiological impacts on Jersey crossbred cows. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 71, 483–490.Google Scholar
Mandal, DK, Bhakat, C and Dutta, TK (2021) Impact of environmental factors on physiological adaptability, thermo-tolerance indices and productivity in Jersey crossbred cows. International Journal of Biometeorology 65, 1999–2009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nasr, MA and El-Tarabany, MS (2017) Impact of three THI levels on somatic cell count, milk yield and composition of multiparous Holstein cows in a subtropical region. Journal of Thermal Biology 64, 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patil, SM, Bharambe, VY and Khirari, PB (2014) Effect of shelter management on lactating crossbred cows during summer under the agro-climatic condition of Konkan region of India. Journal of Animal Research 4, 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahu, D, Mandal, DK, Hussain Dar, A, Podder, M and Gupta, A (2021) Modification in housing system affects the behavior and welfare of dairy Jersey crossbred cows in different seasons. Biological Rhythm Research 52, 1303–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schalm, OW, Carroll, EJ and Jain, NC (1971) Bovine Mastitis. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 360.Google Scholar
Sinha, R, Kamboj, ML, Lathwal, SS and Ranjan, A (2017) Effect of housing management on production performance of crossbred cows during hot-humid season. Indian Journal of Animal Research 53, 173–177.Google Scholar
Sivakumar, T, Suraj, PT, Yasotha, A and Phukon, J (2017) Identification of suitable housing system for dairy cattle in north east zone of Tamil Nadu, India, with respect to microclimate. Veterinary World 10, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Sahu et al. supplementary material

Sahu et al. supplementary material

Download Sahu et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 218.5 KB