Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:28:59.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of intramammary infection during the dry period on the milk production of the affected quarter at the start of the succeeding lactation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. Smith ,
F. H. Dodd  and
F. K. Neave
A. Smith
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
F. H. Dodd
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
F. K. Neave
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Intramammary infection present in quarters of dairy cows, either throughout the dry period or originating in the dry period, reduces the milk yield after calving. Relative to the milk yield of equivalent non-infected quarters of the same udder the reduction was found in this work to be about 35%. The relative milk yield of quarters found infected in late lactation was depressed by 48% but if the infection was eliminated during the dry period, the depression in milk yield was only 11% after parturition.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , June 1968 , pp. 287 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Car, M. (1961). Poljopr. znanst. Smotra 18, 337.Google Scholar
(Dairy Sci. Abstr. 26, no. 3308.)Google Scholar
Crossman, J. V., Dodd, F. H., Lee, J. M. & Neave, F. K. (1950). J. Dairy Res. 17, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, A. (1946). Ada Agric. suec. 1, 153.Google Scholar
Johansson, I. & Korkman, N. (1952). Hereditas 38, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcleod, D. H. & Wilson, S. M. (1951). J. Dairy Res. 18, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minett, F. C. & Martin, W. J. (1936). J. Dairy Res. 7, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donovan, F. J., Dodd, F. H. & Neave, F. K. (1960). J. Dairy Res. 27, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, S. J., Neave, F. K., Dodd, F. H. & Oliver, J. (1959). 15th Int. Dairy Congr., London 1, 121.Google Scholar
Smith, A., Westgarth, D. R., Jones, M. R., Neave, F. K., Dodd, F. H. & Brander, G. C. (1967). Vet. Rec. 81, 504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, C. W. (1952). Anatomy of the Udder of Cattle and Domestic Animals. Columbia, Mo.: Lucas.Google Scholar
Watts, P. S. (1951). Vet. Rec. 63, 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheelock, J. V., Rook, J. A. F., Neave, F. K. & Dodd, F. H. (1966). J. Dairy Res. 33, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, G. C., Anderson, E. O., Johnson, R. E., Plastridge, W. N. & Weirether, F. J. (1937). Bull. Storrs agric. Exp. Stn no. 220.Google Scholar