Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:37:48.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of concentration by ultrafiltration on the heat stability of skim-milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. W. Maurice Sweetsur  and
D. Donald Muir
A. W. Maurice Sweetsur
Affiliation:
The Hannah Research Institute, AyrScotlandKA6 5HL
D. Donald Muir
Affiliation:
The Hannah Research Institute, AyrScotlandKA6 5HL
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An examination has been made of the heat stability characteristics of skim-milk concentrate prepared by ultrafiltration (UF). Concentrate prepared by UF was found to be more stable than that prepared by conventional evaporation. In contrast to conventional concentrate, the heat stability of UF concentrate was not appreciably affected by forewarming or addition of permitted stabilizers, but the effect of addition of urea was generally the same for both UF and conventional concentrates; an increase in heat stability was obtained if the milk total solids level was less than 14%. As with conventional concentrate, addition of simple aldehydes induced large increases in the heat stability of UF concentrate. It is suggested that a novel range of sterile milk products could be prepared from UF concentrates. Because of the high protein and low lactose contents of these concentrates, the products might be nutritionally more attractive than those prepared from conventional concentrates.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , October 1980 , pp. 327 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aschaffenburg, R. & Drewry, J. (1959). 15th International Dairy Congress, London 3, 1631–1637.Google Scholar
Biggs, D. A. & Szijarto, L. (1963). Journal of Dairy Science 46, 1196–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Standards Institution (1963). B.S. no. 1741.Google Scholar
Davies, D. T. & White, J. C. D. (1966). Journal of Dairy Research 33, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, P. F. & Hearn, C. M. (1978). Journal of Dairy Research 45, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimbleby, F. H. (1956). Journal of Dairy Research 23, 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, C., Muir, D. D. & Sweetsur, A. W. M. (1978). Journal of Dairy Research 45, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunziker, O. F. (1935). Condensed Milk and Milk Powder, 5th Edn, p. 242. La Grange, Ill.: Author.Google Scholar
A., Leighton. & Mudge, C. S. (1923). Journal of Biological Chemistry 56, 53–73.Google Scholar
Muir, D. D. & Sweetsur, A. W. M. (1976). Journal of Dairy Research 43, 495–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, D. D. & Sweetsur, A. W. M. (1977). Journal of Dairy Research 44, 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, D. D. & Sweetsur, A. W. M. (1978a). 20th International Dairy Congress, Paris E, 744–745.Google Scholar
Muir, D. D. & Sweetsur, A. W. M. (1978b). Journal of Dairy Research 45, 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. (1961). Journal of Dairy Science 44, 1763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. & Tessieb, H. (1959). Journal of Dairy Science 42, 969–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, H. H. & Hart, E. B. (1926). Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin no. 67.Google Scholar
Sweetsur, A. W. M. (1976). Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology 29, 157–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetsur, A. W. M. & Muir, D. D. (1980). Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology. (In press.)Google Scholar
Sweetsur, A. W. M. & White, J. C. D. (1974). Journal of Dairy Research 41, 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetsur, A. W. M. & White, J. C. D. (1975). Journal of Dairy Research 42, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vujicic, I., Deman, J. M. & Woodrow, I. L. (1968). Canadian Institute of Food Technology Journal 1, 17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar