Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T21:33:07.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The detection of volatile components of milk by gas-liquid chromatography and its possible application in assessing keeping quality and flavour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

L. A. Mabbitt  and
Gillian McKinnon
L. A. Mabbitt
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Gillian McKinnon
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The volatile components of milk have been isolated in a form suitable for application to a gas chromatograph, using the simple rapid technique of entraining them in a gas stream and trapping in a syringe barrel cooled in liquid nitrogen.

The souring process in milk which occurred during incubation at 22 °C was followed by observing the differences between chromatograms of samples taken at intervals. Onset of souring was detected with a sensitivity similar to that obtained by measurement of pH, but the chromatographic method had the advantage of being independent of the initial pH and buffering power of the milk.

With suitable chromatographic apparatus the total analysis time including the preparation of the sample could be about 3 min. Modifications are discussed which would increase the speed of analysis, and thus form a basis for the development of a practical method of assessing the odour of milk before processing.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , October 1963 , pp. 359 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bartle, J. (1960). Chem. Age., Lond., 83, 535.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. J. (1960). J. Dairy Res. 27, 41.Google Scholar
Jennings, W. G., Viljhalmsson, S. & Dunkley, W. L. (1962). J. Fd Sci. 27, 306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, R. C. (1963). J. Dairy Res. 30, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mabbitt, L. A. (1963). In Recent Advances in Food Science, vol. 3, p. 185 (eds.; Leitch, J. Muir & Rhodes, D. N.). London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Mackay, D. A. M., Lang, D. A. & Berdick, M. (1959). Proc. Toilet Goods Ass. no. 32.Google Scholar
Patton, S. (1961). J. Dairy Sci. 44, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, T. B. & Forster, E. M. (1958). J. Bact. 75, 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Punch, J. D., Olson, J. C. & Thomas, E. L. (1961). J. Dairy Sci. 44, 1160.Google Scholar
Scott, R. P. W. & Cumming, C. A. (1960). 3rd Int. Symposium on Gas Chromatography, p. 20 (ed., R. P. W., Scott). London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Swoboda, P. A. T. (1960). Chem. & Ind. p. 1262.Google Scholar
Swoboda, P. A. T. (1962). 4th Int. Symposium on Gas Chromatography, p. 29 (ed., Swaay, M. Van). London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Wong, N. P. & Patton, S. (1962). J. Dairy Sci. 45, 724.Google Scholar
Wynn, J. D., Brunner, J. R. & Trout, G. M. (1960). Food Tech., Champaign, 14, 248.Google Scholar