Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:10:57.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deposit formation on heated surfaces: effect of interface energetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Michel Britten ,
Margaret L. Green ,
Marcel Boulet  and
Paul Paquin
Michel Britten
Affiliation:
Département de Sciences et Technologie des Aliments, Groupe de Recherche en Sciences et Technologie du Lait (STELA), Université Laval, Québec, Canada, G1K 7P4
Margaret L. Green
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Food Research, Reading Laboratory, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, UK
Marcel Boulet
Affiliation:
Département de Sciences et Technologie des Aliments, Groupe de Recherche en Sciences et Technologie du Lait (STELA), Université Laval, Québec, Canada, G1K 7P4
Paul Paquin
Affiliation:
Département de Sciences et Technologie des Aliments, Groupe de Recherche en Sciences et Technologie du Lait (STELA), Université Laval, Québec, Canada, G1K 7P4
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Deposit formation was measured in a model laboratory plant in which whole milk was in contact with a heated surface at 100 °C for 1 h. The effect of the interfacial properties of various poly mer-coated surfaces on the amount and the adhesion strength of deposit was determined. The nature of the surface influenced the formation of deposit only slightly, but had a large effect on its adhesion strength. From correlation analysis, the polar contribution to surface energy was identified as the main factor influencing the deposit adhesion strength. These results suggest that the type of interactions at the surface govern the ease of removal of deposit.

Type
Original articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , November 1988 , pp. 551 - 562
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Al-Roubaie, S. M. & Burton, H. 1979 Effect of free fatty acids on the amount of deposit formed from milk on heated surfaces. Journal of Dairy Research 46 463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrade, J. D. 1973 Interfacial phenomena and biomaterials. Medical Instrumentation 7 110–120Google ScholarPubMed
Baier, R. E. 1972 Role of surface energy in thrombogenesis. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 48 257–272Google ScholarPubMed
Baier, R. E. 1975 Applied chemistry at protein interfaces. In Applied Chemistry at Protein Interfaces, pp. 1–25. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society (Advances in Chemistry Series No. 145)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier, R. E. 1981 Modification of surfaces to reduce fouling and/or improve cleaning. In Fundamentals and Applications of Surface Phenomena associated with Fouling and Cleaning in Food Processing, pp. 168–189. (Eds Hallström, B., Lund, D. B. & Ch., Trägårdh) Lund, Sweden: Lund UniversityGoogle Scholar
Bouman, S., Lund, D. B., Driessen, F. M. & Schmidt, D. G. 1982 Growth of thermoresistant streptococci and deposition of milk constituents on plates of heat exchangers during long operating times. Journal of Food Protection 45 806–812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burdett, M. 1974 The effect of phosphates in lowering the amount of deposit formation during the heat treatment of milk. Journal of Dairy Research 41 123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, H. 1968 Reviews of the progress of Dairy Science, G. Deposits from whole milk in heat treatment plant-a review and discussion. Journal of Dairy Research 35 317–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, D. J. & Misra, A. 1985 Surface energetics characterization and relationship to adhesion using a novel contact angle measuring technique. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 108 371–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delsing, B. M. A. & Hiddink, J. 1983 Fouling of heat transfer surfaces by dairy liquids. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 37 139–148Google Scholar
Eirich, F. R. 1968 Factors in interface conversion for polymer coatings. In Interface Conversion for Polymer Coatings pp. 350–378 (Eds Weiss, P. & Cheever, G. D.) New York: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
Fowkes, F. M. 1964 Attractive forces at interfaces. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 56 40–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glantz, P.-O. 1981 Adhesion in the oral cavity. In Fundamentals and Applications of Surface Phenomena associated with Fouling and Cleaning in Food Processing pp. 225–235 (Eds Hallström, B., Lund, D. B. and Ch., Trägårdh) Lund, Sweden: Lund UniversityGoogle Scholar
King, R. N., Andrade, J. D., MA, S. M., Gregonis, D. E. & Brostrom, L. R. 1985 Interfacial tensions at acrylic hydrogel-water interfaces. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 103 62–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalande, M. & Tissier, J.-P. 1986 Experimental device and methods for studying milk deposit formation on heat exchange surfaces. Biotechnology Progress 2 218–229Google Scholar
Lalande, M., Tissier, J.-P. & Corrieu, G. 1984 Fouling of a plate heat exchanger used in ultra-high-temperature sterilization of milk. Journal of Dairy Research 51 557–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, C. A. 1958 Simple microdetermination of Kjeldahl nitrogen in biological materials. Analytical Chemistry 30 1692–1694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRitchie, F. 1978 Proteins at interfaces. Advances in Protein Chemistry 32 283–326CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuire, J., Swartzel, K. R. & Guinnup, D. E. 1985 Measuring substrata influences on biofouling. In Fouling and Cleaning in Food Processing, pp. 168–177 (Eds Lund, D. B., Plett, E. and Sandu, C.). Madison, USAGoogle Scholar
Nordman-Montelius, M. & Von Bockelmann, I. 1985 Analyses of raw milk deposits on non-heated polymer surfaces. In Fouling and Cleaning in Food Processing pp. 276–285 (Eds Lund, D. B., Plett, E. and Sandu, C.). Madison, USAGoogle Scholar
Sandu, C. & Lund, D. B. 1985 Fouling of heating surfaces – chemical reaction fouling due to milk. In Fouling and Cleaning in Food Processing, pp. 122–167 (Eds Lund, D. B., Plett, E. and Sandu, C.). Madison, USAGoogle Scholar
Simonsen, D. G., Wertman, M., Westover, L. M. & Mehl, J. W. 1946 The determination of serum phosphate by the molybdivanadate method. Journal of Biological Chemistry 166 747–755CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skudder, P. J. & Bonsey, A. D. 1985 The effect of milk pH and of citrate concentration on the formation of deposit during UHT processing. In Fouling and Gleaning in Food Processing, pp. 226–234 (Eds Lund, D. B., Plett, E. and Sandu, C.). Madison, USAGoogle Scholar
Van Oss, C. J., Absolom, D. R. & Neumann, A. W. 1979 Repulsive van der Waals Forces. II. Mechanism of hydrophobic chromatography. Separation Science and Technology 14 305–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Oss, C. J., Absolom, D. R. & Neumann, A. W. 1980 The ‘Hydrophobic effect’: Essentially a van der Waals interaction. Colloid and Polymer Science 258 424–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Oss, C. J., Absolom, D. R., Neumann, A. W. & Zingg, W. 1981 Determination of the surface tension of proteins. I. Surface tension of native serum proteins in aqueous media. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 670 64–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Oss, C. J., Good, R. J. & Chaudhury, M. K. 1986 The role of van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonds in ‘hydrophobic interactions’ between biopolymers and low energy surfaces. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 111 378–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zisman, W. A. 1964 Relation of the equilibrium contact angle to liquid and solid constitution. In Contact angle, Wettability, and Adhesion, pp. 1–51 (Ed. Gould, R. F.) Washington, DC: American Chemical Society (Advances in Chemistry Series No. 43)Google Scholar