Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:25:26.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Density-gradient electrophoresis of native and of rennet-treated casein micelles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Margaret L. Green  and
G. Crutchfield
Margaret L. Green
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
G. Crutchfield
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Analytical electrophoresis of native and of rennet-treated casein micelles was carried out at 26 and at 5°C in a sucrose density gradient in a medium of the same ionic composition as milk. Under normal circumstances, the micelles were negatively charged and showed little heterogeneity in the electric field, the fastestmoving ones having at 26°C a mobility not more than 30% greater than that of the slowest. Native micelles were more highly charged at 5 than at 26°C; at each temperature, the mobility was approximately halved by rennet treatment. The results suggest that the effects of rennet treatment and of alterations in temperature on the tendency of the micelles to clot can be entirely explained as being caused by changes in charge.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , June 1971 , pp. 151 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramson, H. A., Moyer, L. S. & Gorin, M. H. (1942). Electrophoresis of Proteins and the Chemistry of Cell Surfaces. New York: Reinhold Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
Albers, W. & Overbeek, J. Th. G. (1960). J. Colloid Sci. 15, 489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brakke, M. K. (1955). Archs Biochem. Biophys. 55, 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brakke, M. K. (1964). Archs Biochem. Biophys. 107, 388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheeseman, G. C. (1962). 16th Int. Dairy Congr., Copenhagen B, 465.Google Scholar
Davies, D. T. & White, J. C. D. (1960). J. Dairy Res. 27, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derjaguin, B. (1940). Trans. Faraday Soc. 36, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnier, J. (1966). J. molec. Biol. 19, 586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankinson, C. L. & Briggs, D. R. (1941). J. phys. Chem., Ithaca 45, 943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenness, R. & Patton, S. (1959). Principles of Dairy Chemistry. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Jollès, P. (1966). Angew. Chem. (int. Edn) 5, 558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longsworth, L. G. & Macinnes, D. A. (1939). Chem. Rev. 24, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, T. C. A. & Pyne, G. T. (1960). J. Dairy Res. 27, 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMeekin, T. L. & Groves, M. L. (1965). In Fundamentals of Dairy Chemistry, p. 374. (Eds Webb, B. H. and Johnson, A. H.). Westport, Conn: Avi Publishing Co.Google Scholar
MacRitchie, F. & Alexander, A. E. (1961). J. Colloid Sci. 16, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitschmann, H. (1949). Helv. chim. Acta 32, 1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payens, T. A. J. (1966). J. Dairy Sci. 49, 1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribadeau Dumas, B. (1968). Biochim. biophys. Acta 168, 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribadeau Dumas, B. & Garnier, J. (1970). J. Dairy Res. 37, 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. (1968). J. Dairy Sci. 51, 1897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. (1969). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 31, 171.Google Scholar
Schipper, C. J. & Mulder, H. (1962). 16th Int. Dairy Congr., Copenhagen B, 529.Google Scholar
Shugar, D. (1952). Biochem. J. 52, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, H. A. (Ed.) (1968). Handbook of Biochemistry. Cleveland, Ohio: Chemical Rubber Co.Google Scholar
Svensson, H. (1960). In A Laboratory Manual of Analytical Methods of Protein, Chemistry (including Polypeptides), 1, p. 195. (Eds Alexander, P. and Block, R. J.). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Verma, I. S. & Gehrke, C. W. (1957). J. Dairy Sci. 40, 1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verwey, E. J. W. & Overbeek, J. Th. G. (1948). Theory of the Stability of Lyophobic Colloids. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Co.Google Scholar