Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:23:36.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The composition of milk of British Alpine and Anglo–Nubian goats imported into Trinidad

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

C. Devendra
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad

Summary

The variations in the composition of milk over an 18-week period from lactating British Alpine and Anglo–Nubian goats imported into Trinidad are reported. The animals were fed Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) ad lib. and 2 lb of a proprietary concentrate mixture daily.

The mean percentage contents of the milks of British Alpine and Anglo–Nubian goats were: total solids 11·49±0·22, 12·17±0·28; butterfat 3·42±0·18, 4·06±0·22; total N 0·462±0·04, 0·530±0·07; ash 0·78±0·02, 0·79±0·03 and ‘lactose’ 4·38±0·28, 4·05±0·55. Anglo–Nubian goats had a higher content of percentage total solids, fat, total N and ash. For all constituents the coefficient of variation between weeks was higher for Anglo–Nubian goats. No significant trends were found between weeks for each of the components analysed for both breeds. Statistically significant correlations (P < 0·01) were found between percentage fat and percentage total N for both breeds.

The mean mineral contents (mg/100ml) for the milks of British Alpine and Anglo–Nubian goats were: Na 52·6±4·6, 55·5±1·9; K164·0±8·4, 133·4±11·4; Ca 85·5±11·6, 89·9±9·8; Mg 13·2±3·8, 10·2±1·6 and P 74·7±3·9, 82·1±3·9. British Alpine goat's milk had a higher content of K and that of Anglo–Nubian goats had a higher content of P; both differences were statistically significant (P < 0·01).

The milk composition figures in this study together with those from a similar study in Guadeloupe suggest that the values are low and considerably lower in comparison with the same breeds of goats in a temperate environment. This could be a feature of dairy goats imported into the tropics due perhaps to inadequate nutrition. Much more information is needed to verify this possibility.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1965). Official Methods of Analysis, 10th edn.Washington, D.C.: A.O.A.C.Google Scholar
Bosworth, A. W. & Van Slyke, L. L. (1916). Journal of Biological Chemistry 24, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenost, M. & Geoffroy, F. (1971). 2nd International Conference on Goat Breeding, Tours, France, 17–19 07 1971.Google Scholar
Devendra, C. & Burns, M. (1970). Technical Communication, Commonwealth Bureau of Animal Breeding and Genetics, No. 19. Farnham Royal, Bucks: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Gamble, J. A., Ellis, N. R. & Besley, A. K. (1939). Technical Bulletin, U.S. Department of Agriculture no. 671.Google Scholar
Holmes, A. D., Lindquist, H. G. & Greenwood, E. K. (1945). Journal of Dairy Science 28, 853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, F. & Watkin, J. E. (1938). Journal of Dairy Research 9, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondo, K. & Mori, S. (1932). Journal of the Chemical Society of Japan 53, 1163.Google Scholar
Lythgoe, H. C. (1940). Journal of Dairy Science 23, 1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macy, I. G., Kelley, H. J. & Sloan, R. E. (1953). Publication of the National Research Council, Washington, No. 245.Google Scholar
Nirmalan, G. & Nair, M. K. (1962). Kerala Vet 1, 49.Google Scholar
Opstvedt, J. (1967). In Grassland in Sheep Production, p. 89. (Ed. Spedding, C. R. W..) E.A.A.P. Study Commission on Animal Nutrition, Report no. 2.Google Scholar
Parkash, S. & Jenness, R. (1968). Dairy Science Abstracts 30, 67.Google Scholar
Rønningen, K. (1965). Meldinger fra Norges Landbrukshøgskole 44 (29).Google Scholar
Sirry, I. & Hassan, H. A. (1954). Indian Journal of Dairy Science 7, 188.Google Scholar
Trout, G. M. (1941). Quarterly Bulletin Michigan State College Agricultural Experiment Station 23, 254.Google Scholar