Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T11:19:47.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of milks processed by the direct and indirect methods of ultra-high-temperature sterilization: VI. Effects on sediment formation and clotting with enzymes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. G. Perkin ,
M. J. Henschel  and
H. Burton
A. G. Perkin
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
M. J. Henschel
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
H. Burton
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

When heat treatments of the same sporicidal effectiveness were given, directly heated ultra-high-temperature sterilized milk gave twice as much sediment as indirectly heated milk after storage at room temperature for 100 days. Both types of process reduced the rate of clotting of the milk with pepsin and rennin, but the effect of the indirect process was markedly greater than that of the direct process.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , June 1973 , pp. 215 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berridge, N. J. (1952). Analyst 77, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berridge, N. J. (1955). Methods in Enzymology 2, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, H. (1968). Journal of Dairy Research 35, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, H., Ford, J. E., Perkin, A. G., Porter, J. W. G., Scott, K. J., Thompson, S. Y., Toothill, J. & Edwards-Webb, J. D. (1970). Journal of Dairy Research 37, 529.Google Scholar
Burton, H. & Perkin, A. G. (1970). Journal of Dairy Research 37, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corradini, C., Dellaglio, F. & Bottazzi, V. (1967). Scienza e Tecnica Lattiero-Casearia 18, 277.Google Scholar
Franklin, J. G., Underwood, H. M., Perkin, A. G. & Burton, H. (1970). Journal of Dairy Research 37, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hostettler, H. & Imhof, K. (1963). Milchwissenschaft 18, 2.Google Scholar
Kaliba, J., Kott, J., Jirovský, A., Šulc, J. & Suchomel, J. (1960). Průmysl Potravin 11, 311.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. L. J., Wyeth, T. C., Perkin, A. G. & Burton, H. (1971). Journal of Dairy Research 38, 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller-Madsen, A., Hansen, K., Poulsen, P. R., Mondorf, U., Vilholm, J., Hansen, K., Dohn, J. & Nielsen, F. (1965 a). 151 Beretning, Statens Forsøgsmejeri, Hillerød.Google Scholar
Møller-Madsen, A., Hansen, K., Poulsen, P. R., Mondorf, U., Vilholm, J., Hansen, K., Dohn, J. & Nielsen, F. (1965 b). 152 Beretning, Statens Forsøgsmejeri, Hillerød.Google Scholar
National Institute for Research in Dairying (1966). Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology 19, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelsson, E.-G., Gynning, K. & Olsson, H. (1962). 16th International Dairy Congress, Copenhagen A, 685.Google Scholar
Samuelsson, E.-G. & Holm, S. (1966). 17th International Dairy Congress, Munich B, 57.Google Scholar
Sawyer, W. H. (1969). Journal of Dairy Science 52, 1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shillam, K. W. G., Dawson, D. A. & Roy, J. H. B. (1960). British Journal of Nutrition 14, 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomé, K. E., Samuelsson, E.-G. & Holm, S. (1964) Report no. 70. Milk and Dairy Research, Alnarp.Google Scholar
United States Steel (1965). Processing Sterilized Milk Concentrate of Beverage Quality. United States Steel Corporation.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. A. & Wheelock, J. V. (1972). Journal of Dairy Research 39, 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, H. K., Herreid, E. O. & Whitney, R. McL. (1960). Journal of Dairy Science 43, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar