Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:59:29.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The cell count of milk in relation to milk yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. Meijering ,
F. H. J. Jaartsveld ,
M. W. A. Verstegen  and
M. J. M. Tielen
A. Meijering
Affiliation:
1Agricultural University, Department of Animal Husbandry, Wageningen, The Netherlands;
F. H. J. Jaartsveld
Affiliation:
2Animal Health Service of Noord-Brabant, Boxtel, The Netherlands
M. W. A. Verstegen
Affiliation:
1Agricultural University, Department of Animal Husbandry, Wageningen, The Netherlands;
M. J. M. Tielen
Affiliation:
2Animal Health Service of Noord-Brabant, Boxtel, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Quarter-milk cell counts and milk yields from 1000 cows in the province of Noord-Brabant were obtained over a 12-month period. The data from 933 animals, mainly heifers, were used to examine statistically the relationship between cell counts, as a criterion for sub-clinical forms of mastitis, and milk yield. Losses in milk were assessed by quarter, by pairs of quarters and by cow. The conclusions were that the losses in milk due to sub-clinical forms of mastitis, as indicated by cell count, can be substantial. The existence of a compensating increase in milk yield from a healthy gland, in response to the loss of milk from a neighbouring quarter with raised cell count, could not be demonstrated.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , February 1978 , pp. 5 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon, . (1974). Mededelingen betreffende de Gezondheidsdienst voor Dieren in Friesland, Jaarverslag 55.Google Scholar
Cullen, G. A. (1966). Veterinary Bulletin 36, 337.Google Scholar
Forster, T. L., Ashworth, U. S. & Luedecke, L. O. (1967). Journal of Dairy Science 50, 675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, W. R. (1960). Report 20-8, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Jaartsveld, F. H. J. (1974). Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde 99, 605.Google Scholar
Janzen, J. J. (1970). Journal of Dairy Science 53, 1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. O. L. (1967). Veterinary Record 80, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüps, P. & Ritter, H. Chr. (1965). Bayerisches Landwirtschaftliches Jahrbuch 42, 296.Google Scholar
Meijering, A. (1975). Report, Agricultural University, Wageningen /Animal Health Service, Boxtel.Google Scholar
Morris, R. S. (1973). Australian Veterinary Journal 49, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philpot, W. N. (1967). Journal of Dairy Science 50, 978.Google Scholar
Reichmuth, J. (1968). Dissertation, Berlin.Google Scholar
Renk, W. (1963). In Krankheiten der Milchdrüse bei Haustieren. (Eds Heidrich, H. J. and Renk, W..) Hamburg, Berlin: Paul Parey Verlag.Google Scholar
Rooy, J. de & Jaartsveld, F. H. J. (1969). Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde 94, 1259.Google Scholar
Tolle, A. (1969). Milchwissenschaft 24, 457.Google Scholar
Waite, R. & Blackburn, P. S. (1957). Journal of Dairy Research 24, 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeidler, H., Tolle, A. & Heeschen, W. (1968). Milchwissenschaft 23, 674.Google Scholar