Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:18:10.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bacteriological investigations of clinical mastitis in heifers in Sweden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Per Jonsson
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 583, S-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden
Sven-Ove Olsson
Affiliation:
Swedish Association for Livestock Breeding and Production, S-631 84 Eskilstuna, Sweden
Ann-Sophie Olofson
Affiliation:
National Veterinary Institute, Box 7073, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Christer Fälth
Affiliation:
Swedish Association for Livestock Breeding and Production, S-631 84 Eskilstuna, Sweden
Olof Holmberg
Affiliation:
National Veterinary Institute, Box 7073, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Hans Funke
Affiliation:
Swedish Association for Livestock Breeding and Production, S-631 84 Eskilstuna, Sweden

Summary

Bacterial analyses were carried out of 2069 udder secretions, isolated from 1481 heifers with mastitis in eight veterinary districts in Sweden. Streptococci, e.g. Streptococcus dysgalactiae and Str. uberis, dominated the bacterial flora, being isolated from 34·4 and 19·5% respectively of heifers with clinical mastitis occurring from puberty up to 14 d post partum. Bacterial species generally regarded as important pathogens in the summer mastitis complex, e.g. Actinomyces pyogenes, Stuart–Schwan coccus and strictly anaerobic bacteria such as Peptostreptococcus indolicus, Fusobacterium necrophorum and Bacteroides melaninogenicus were isolated at low frequencies (13·2, 6·3, 9·4, 3·8 and 1·3% respectively). When the cases of mastitis studied were restricted to those appearing in heifers pre partum, May 15 to October 14 (summer mastitis), these bacterial species were isolated at higher percentages (27·1, 14·4, 21·4, 13·5 and 5·2% respectively). These figures were, nevertheless, still lower than those published in reports from other countries. Whether considered up to 14 d post partum or only pre partum, there were no significant differences in the frequencies of A. pyogenes isolated at different seasons. There were geographical differences in bacterial incidence, e.g. Staphylococcus aureus was isolated significantly more often in northern regions whereas Str. dysgalactiae was more common in the south. This and other Swedish investigations support the theory that A. pyogenes and strictly anaerobic bacteria are ‘secondary invaders’ that depend on Str. dysgalactiae to cause a primary infection. It is stressed that the udders of all heifers should be examined daily so that cases of mastitis can be treated immediately.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anonymous. 1986 Animal health care 1984/85. Swedish Association for Livestock Breeding and Production Report No. 139, pp. 4144Google Scholar
Armitage, P. 1971 Statistical Methods in Medical Research. London: Blackwell Scientific PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Egan, J. 1985 Evidence of Corynebacterium pyogenes as a secondary pathogen in mastitis in lactating cows. Kieler Milchwirtschaftliche Forschungsberichte 37 585588Google Scholar
Everz, K. E. & Linge, F. 1979 [Investigation of the incidence of heifer mastitis on Gotland.] Swedish Association for Livestock Breeding and Production, Publication No. 98 pp. 2332Google Scholar
Franke, V., Tolle, A., Reichmuth, J. & Beimgraben, J. 1983 Heifer mastitis in Schleswig-Holstein/FRG-situation, bacteriology, prevention. Heifer Mastitis Seminar, Stockholm-Helsinki. Eskilstuna: Swedish Association for Livestock Breeding and ProductionGoogle Scholar
Glage, F. 1908 Holsteinische Euterseuche. [Udder disease of Holsteins.] Berliner Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 48 862863Google Scholar
Hamana, K. 1988 Etiology, nature and prevention of heifer mastitis. 15th World Buiatrics Congress pp. 458467Google Scholar
Hillerton, J. E., Bramley, A. J. & Watson, C. A. 1987 The epidemiology of summer mastitis; a survey of clinical cases. British Veterinary Journal 143 520530CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holdeman, L. V., Cato, E. P. & Moore, W. E. C. 1977 Anaerobe Laboratory Manual, 4th edn.Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityGoogle Scholar
Høi Søeensen, G. 1979 [Summer mastitis.] Thesis, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
Klastrup, O. & Schmidt Madsen, P. 1974 [Standard methods for bacteriological investigation of quarter samples. Nordic recommendations.] Nordisk Veterinär Medicin 26 197204Google Scholar
Madsen, M. 1985 [Summer mastitis. Investigations of the bacteriology and transmission dynamics of summer mastitis in cattle.] Thesis, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
Madsen, M. 1987 The bacteriology of summer mastitis. In Summer Mastitis (CEC Workshop, Summer mastitis, Lelystad, The Netherlands) pp. 4349 (Els Thomas, G., Over, H. J., Vecht, U. and Nansen, P.) Dordrecht: Martinus NijhoffCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, A. B. 1981 Summer mastitis. In Mastitis Control and Herd Management pp. 8194 (Eds Bramley, A. J., Dodd, F. H. and Griffin, T. K.) Reading: National Institute for Research in Dairying (NIRD/HRI Technical Bulletin No. 4)Google Scholar
Olsson, S.-O. (Ed.) 1978 Swedish Association for Livestock Breeding and Production, Publication No. 98Google Scholar
Oliver, S. P. 1988 Heifer mastitis in a herd with a low prevalence of contagious pathogens: frequency of bacterial isolation and intramammary infections during the periparturient period. 15th World Buiatrics Congress pp. 490494Google Scholar
Schwan, O. 1979 Heifer mastitis and dry cow mastitis. Thesis, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
Slee, K. J. & McOrist, S. 1985 Mastitis of cattle due to a group of pyogenic bacteria. Australian Veterinary Journal 62 6365CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sol, J., Vecht, U. & Thomas, G. 1985 Summer mastitis: incidence, bacteriology, etiology, methods of prevention and entomological aspects. Kieler Milchwirtschaftliche Forschungsberichte 37 593600Google Scholar
Stuart, P., Buntain, D. & Langridge, R. G. 1951 Bacteriological examination of secretions from cases of ‘Summer Mastitis’ and experimental infection of non-lactating bovine udders. Veterinary Record 63 451453CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, G., Over, H. J., Vecht, U. & Nansen, P. (Eds) 1987 CEC Workshop, Summer mastitis, Lelystad, The Netherlands Dordrecht: Martinus NijhoffCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolle, A., Reichmuth, J., Franke, V. & Beimgraben, J. 1985 [Studies on bovine summer mastitis.] Kieler Milchwirtschaftliche Forschungsberichte 37 125212Google Scholar
Wass, K. 1986 [Trial with vaccination against heifer mastitis.] Svensk Veterinärtidning 38 239243Google Scholar