Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:29:41.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anaerobic digestion of deproteinated cheese whey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Johannes De Haast ,
Trevor J. Britz ,
Johannes C. Novello  and
Emilige W. Verwey
Johannes De Haast
Affiliation:
Department of Dairy Science and University of the Orange Free State, PO Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa,
Trevor J. Britz
Affiliation:
Microbiology, University of the Orange Free State, PO Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa,
Johannes C. Novello
Affiliation:
Department of Dairy Science and University of the Orange Free State, PO Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa,
Emilige W. Verwey
Affiliation:
Department of Dairy Science and University of the Orange Free State, PO Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Whey and deproteinated whey preparations with different carbon: nitrogen (C/N) ratios ranging from 7·5 to 73 were digested anaerobically in a downflow stationary fixed-bed reactor at 35 °C with a hydraulic retention time of 5 d. Effluent and biogas parameters indicated that no decrease in digestion and stability occurred at the highest C/N ratio. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal averaged 88%, while volatile fatty acids were maintained at a low level (< 500 mg l–1). Biogas yield averaged 0·423 m3 kg–1 COD and the methane content of the biogas varied between 57 and 63%. Ammonia toxicity occurred at a C/N ratio of 7/5 in the substrate feed. Virtually no ammonia N was detected in the effluent when whey substrates with C/N ratios of 50 and 73 were fed. Titration curves showed that buffer intensities in the effluent were not affected by a decrease in ammonia level. A decrease in the biomass content of the effluent which occurred as a result of the increase in C/N ratio of the substrate did not cause any rate limiting effect on biogas production. The removal of protein from the whey caused a reduction in the ratio of COD: total carbon in the whey. On average 59% of the carbon in the substrate was converted to biogas.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , August 1985 , pp. 457 - 467
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Public Health Association 1975 Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water 14th edn (Ed. Franson, M. A.) Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, Water Works Association, Pollution Control FederationGoogle Scholar
Bech, A. M. 1981 The physical and chemical properties of whey proteins. Dairy Mail International 11 04, 8–24Google Scholar
Belyaev, S. S., Wolkin, R., Kenealy, W. R., De Niro, M. J., Epstein, S. & Zeikus, J. G. 1983 Methanogenic bacteria from the Bondyuzhshoe oil field: general characterization and analysis of stable carbon isotopic fractionation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 45 691–697CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boening, P. H. & Larsen, V. F. 1982 Anaerobicfluidized bed whey treatment. Biotecnology and Bioengineering 14 2539–2556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brune, G., Schoberth, S. M. & Sahm, H. 1982 Anaerobic treatment of an industrial waste water containing acetic acid, furfural and sulphite. Process Biochemistry 17(3) 20–22, 24, 35Google Scholar
Callander, I. J. & Barford, J. P. 1983 Cheese whey anaerobic digestion – effect of chemical flocculant addition. Biotechnology Letters 5 153–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colin, P., Ferrero, G. L., Gerletti, M., Hobson, P., L'Hermite, P., Naveau, H. P. & Nyns, E. J. 1983 Proposal for the definition of parameters and analytical measurements applicable to the anaerobic digestion processes. Agricultural Wastes 7 183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbin, E. A. & Whittier, E. O. 1965 The composition of milk. In Fundamentals of Dairy Chemistry pp. 1–36 (Eds Webb, B. H. and Johnson, A. H.). Westport, CT: Avi Publishing Company, IncGoogle Scholar
De Haast, J., Britz, T. J., Novello, J. C. & Lateqan, P. M. 1983 Anaerobic digestion of cheese whey using a stationary fixed-bed reactor. New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 18 261–271Google Scholar
Delaney, R. A. M. 1981 Recent developments in the utilization of whey. Cultured Dairy Products Journal 16(2) 11–17, 20–22Google Scholar
De Wit, J. N. 1981 Structure and functional behaviour of whey proteins. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 35 47–64Google Scholar
Forday, W. & Greenfield, P. F. 1983 Anaerobic digestion. Effluent and Water Treatment Journal 23 405–413Google Scholar
Fox, P. F. & Mulvihill, D. M. 1982 Milk proteins: molecular, colloidal and functional properties. Journal of Dairy Research 49 679–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, M., Scharer, J. M. & Moo-Young, M. 1980 Effect of corn stover addition on the anaerobic digestion of swine manure. Agricultural Wastes 2 177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georoacakis, D., Sievers, D. M. & Iannotti, E. L. 1982 Buffer stability in manure digesters. Agricultural Wastes 4 427–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashimoto, A. G. 1981 Methane production and effluent quality from fermentation of beef cattle manure and molasses. Biotechnology and Bioengineering Symposium no. 11 481–492Google Scholar
Hills, D. J. 1979 Effects of carbon: nitrogen ratio on anaerobic digestion of dairy manure. Agricultural Wastes 1 267–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunoate, R. E. & Stach, R. J. 1982 Phenylpropanoic acid: growth factor for Ruminococcus albus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 44 79–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, M. K., Singh, R. & Tauro, P. 1981 Anaerobic digestion of cattle and sheep wastes. Agricultural Wastes 3 65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, K. R. 1982 Industrial isolation of milk proteins: whey proteins. In Developments in Dairy Chemistry – 1. Proteins pp. 339–373 (Ed. Fox, P. F.). London: Applied Science Publishers LtdGoogle Scholar
Short, J. L. 1978 Prospects for the utilization of deproteinated whey in New Zealand – a review. New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 13 181–194Google Scholar
Stafford, D. A., Hawkes, D. L. & Horton, R. 1978 Methane Production from Waste Organic Matter. Florida: CRC PressGoogle Scholar
Touzel, J. P. & Albagnac, G. 1983 Isolation and characterization of Methanococcus mazei strain MC3. FEMS Microbiology Letters 16 241–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Den Berg, L., Lamb, K. A., Murray, W. D. & Armstrong, D. W. 1980 Effects of sulphate, iron and hydrogen on the microbiological conversion of acetic acid to methane. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 48 437–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitney, R. M., Brunner, J. R., Ebner, K. E., Farrell, H. M., Josephson, R. V., Morr, C. V. & Swaisgood, H. E. 1976 Nomenclature of the proteins of cow's milk; fourth revision. Journal of Dairy Science 59 795–815CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed