Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:15:22.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Whey protein denaturation in heated milk and cheese whey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Robyn M. Hillier
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
Richard L. J. Lyster
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT

Summary

Quantitative polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis has been used to measure residual native whey proteins remaining after heat treatment of skim-milk and cheese whey in a kinetic study. The denaturation of α-lactalbumin (α-la) appeared to be first order, but was probably a second-order reaction displaying pseudo first-order kinetics. The denaturation of both β-lactoglobulin A and B (β-lgA and β-lgB) followed second-order kinetics while that of serum albumin was more complex, and could equally well be described as first or second order. Equations are given relating log k1 (in s-1) to temperature for α-la denaturation in skim-milk between 70 and 95 °C and between 100 and 150 °C. Similarly, equations relating log k2 (in lg-1s-1) to temperature are given for ²-lgA in skim-milk between 100 and 150 °C, and for ²-lgB between 95 and 150 °C. The relative heat stability of ²-lgA and ²-lgB was found to vary.

Below 95 °C ²-lgA appeared slightly more thermostable than ²-lgB in skim-milk, and the same was observed in cheese whey below 100 °C. Above these temperatures ²-lgB appeared more stable than ²-lgA.

Denaturation of ²-lgB was only slightly more rapid in skim-milk than in whey at temperatures below 95 °C, but was significantly slower at higher temperatures.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aschaffenburg, R. & Drewry, J. (1957). Biochemistry Journal 65, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, A., Oroz, M. & Blanc, B. (1976). Journal of Dairy Research 43, 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darling, D. F. & Butcher, D. W. (1976). Journal of Dairy Science 59, 863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elfagm, A. A. (1977). Thesis, University of Bradford.Google Scholar
Gough, P. & Jenness, R. (1962). Journal of Dairy Science 45, 1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, E. J., Vettel, H. E. & Pallansch, M. J. (1967). Journal of Dairy Science 50, 828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillier, R. M. (1976). Journal of Dairy Research 43, 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutlett, J. R. (1964). Quarterly Reviews, Chemical Society 18, 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R. L. J. (1970). Journal of Dairy Research 37, 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morr, C. V. (1973). Journal of Dairy Science 56, 1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüegg, M., Moor, U. & Blanc, B. (1975). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 400, 334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüegg, M., Moor, U. & Blanc, B. (1977). Journal of Dairy Research 44, 509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüegg, M., Moor, U., Lukesch, A. & Blanc, B. (1977). In Application of Calorimetry in Life Sciences, p. 59. New York, USA: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sabarwal, P. K. & Ganguli, N. C. (1972). Journal of Dairy Science 55, 765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiechen, A. & Knoop, A -M. (1974). Milchwissenschaft 29, 65.Google Scholar