Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T08:51:50.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies of the secretion of milk of low fat content by cows on diets low in hay and high in concentrates: VII. The effect of administration of volatile fatty acids to cows giving normal milk and milk of low fat content

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

C. C. Balch  and
S. J. Rowland
C. C. Balch
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
S. J. Rowland
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The administration of 0·5–1·5 kg. sodium acetate to cows in which the milk fat percentage had been reduced by diets low in hay and high in concentrates usually brought about an appreciable improvement in fat percentage. The extent of the response varied from slight to complete. The Reichert value of the milk fat fell with diets low in hay, but was raised by administration of acetate.

2. The daily administration of 500 g. sodium acetate to cows receiving diets containing normal levels of hay and concentrates according to their milk yields did not affect the milk fat content.

3. The daily administration of 414 g. sodium propionate did not restore fat percentages lowered by the diets low in hay. Butyrate appeared, in a test with one cow, to possess the restorative properties of acetate.

4. With diets containing either 50 lb. silage as the sole roughage or 60 lb. fodder beet and only 6 lb. hay, fat percentages were the same as with a normal diet containing 16 lb. hay.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , June 1959 , pp. 162 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Balch, C. C.Balch, D. A., Bartlett, S., Bartrum, M. P., Johnson, V. W., Rowland, S. J. & Turner, J. (1955). J. Dairy Res. 22, 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Stoddard, G. E., Allen, N. N. & Peterson, W. H. (1949). J. Anim. Sci. 8, 630.Google Scholar
(3)Tyznik, W. & Allen, N. N. (1951). J. Dairy Sci. 34, 493.Google Scholar
(4)Balch, C. C., Balch, D. A., Bartlett, S., Johnson, V. W., Rowland, S. J. & Turner, J. (1954). J. Dairy Res. 21, 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Balch, C. C., Balch, D. A., Bartlett, S., Cox, C. P., Rowland, S. J. & Turner, J. (1954). J. Dairy Res. 21, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Popják, G., French, T. H. & Folley, S. J. (1951). Biochem. J. 48, 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Popják, G., French, T. H., Hunter, G. D. & Martin, A. J. P. (1951). Biochem. J. 48, 612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Zelter, Z. (1950). C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 231, 1574.Google Scholar