Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:25:55.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationships between dietary fatty acids, plasma lipid composition and milk fat secretion in the cow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. H. Moore ,
W. Steele  and
R. C. Noble
J. H. Moore
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr, Scotland
W. Steele
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr, Scotland
R. C. Noble
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of the isocaloric replacement of starch in a low-fat concentrate mixture by either 5 or 10% ‘stearic acid’ (85% pure) or by 10% ‘palmitic acid’ (85% pure) on the composition of the plasma lipids were investigated in a feeding experiment with 12 cows in mid-lactation. The concentrate mixtures were given with a high roughage diet that supplied daily 4·4 kg of hay and 2·7 kg of sugar-beet pulp. A study was made of the relationships between the compositions of the plasma and milk lipids.

The inclusion of 10% ‘stearic acid’ or 10% ‘palmitic acid’ in the concentrate mixture increased the concentration of total plasma fatty acids. Irrespective of dietary treatment, about 40% of the total plasma fatty acids occurred in the cholesteryl ester fraction, 54% in the phospholipid fraction, 3% in the triglyceride fraction and 3% in the unesterified fatty acid fraction. There was a positive curvilinear relationship between the concentration of unesterified fatty acids in the plasma and the yield of total milk fatty acids.

In the plasma triglycerides, the concentrations of 16:0 and 16:1 were decreased and the concentration of 18:0 was increased when the concentrate mixture contained ‘stearic acid’; the concentration of 16:0 was increased and the concentrations of 18:0, 18:1 and 18:2 were decreased when the concentrate mixture contained ‘palmitic acid’. Similar changes were observed in the compositions of the plasma unesterified fatty acids when the cows were given the different diets.

In the plasma cholesteryl esters, the concentration of 16:0 was decreased and the concentrations of 18:3 and 20:4 were increased when the concentrate mixture contained stearic acid; the concentrations of 16:1, 18:3 and 20:4 were increased and the concentration of 18:2 was decreased when the diet was supplemented with palmitic acid. The addition of stearic acid to the diet increased the concentration of 18:0, 18:1 and 18:3 in the plasma phospholipids but decreased the concentrations of 16:0, 18:2, 20:3 and 20:4. When the diet contained palmitic acid the concentrations of 16:0, 16:1, 18:1 and 18:3 in the plasma phospholipids were increased but the concentrations of 18:0, 18:2 and 20:3 were decreased.

The major fatty acid circulating in the plasma of the cows was 18:2, which accounted for about 45% of the total plasma fatty acids. Only about 0·7% of the total plasma 18:2 occurred in the plasma triglycerides.

The results are discussed in relation to the changes in the composition of the milk fatty acids produced by the cows when they were given the experimental diets.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , October 1969 , pp. 383 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Annison, E. F. (1960). Aust. J. agric. Res. 11, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annison, E. F. (1964). In Metabolism and Physiological Significance of Lipids, p. 289 (eds. Dawson, R. M. C. and Rhodes, D. N.). London: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Annison, E. F., Linzell, J. L., Fazakerley, S. & Nicholls, B. W. (1967). Biochem. J. 102, 637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, J. M., Bartley, W., Linzell, J. L. & Robinson, D. S. (1963). Biochem. J. 89, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerstaffe, R. & Annison, E. F. (1968 a). Biochem. J. 108, 47P.Google Scholar
Bickerstaffe, R. & Annison, E. F. (1968 b). Biochem. J. 107, 27 P.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental Designs, 2nd edn.London: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Duncan, W. R. H. & Garton, G. A. (1963). Biochem. J. 89, 414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, P. E. & Lascelles, A. K. (1964). Aust. J. biol. Sci. 17, 935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havel, R. J. (1958). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 6, 662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronfeld, D. S. (1965). Vet. Rec. 77, 30.Google Scholar
Lauryssens, M., Verbeke, R., Peeters, G., Garton, G. A., Lough, A. K. & Duncan, W. R. H. (1960). Archs int. Physiol. Biochim. 68, 511.Google Scholar
Lindsay, D. B. (1961). In Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of the Ruminant, p. 235 (ed. Lewis, D.). London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
McBride, O. W. & Korn, E. D. (1963). J. Lipid Res. 4, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClymont, G. L. & Vallance, S. (1962). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 21, xli.Google Scholar
Moore, J. H., Noble, R. C. & Steele, W. (1968). Br. J. Nutr. 22, 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J. H. & Steele, W. (1968). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 27, 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, G. J. & Freeman, N. K. (1959). J. biol. Chem. 234, 1375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, R. C., Steele, W. & Moore, J. H. (1969). J. Dairy Res. 36, 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raju, P. K. & Reiser, R. (1967). J. biol. Chem. 242, 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D. S. (1963). J. Lipid Res. 4, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoefl, G. L. & French, J. E. (1968). Proc. R. Soc. B 169, 153.Google Scholar
Steele, W. (1969). J. Dairy Res. 36, 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, W. & Moore, J. H. (1968 a). J. Dairy Res. 35, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, W. & Moore, J. H. (1968 b). J. Dairy Res. 35, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, W. & Moore, J. H. (1968 c). J. Dairy Res. 35, 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storry, J. E. & Rook, J. A. F. (1965). Biochem. J. 97, 879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tove, S. B. & Mochrie, R. D. (1963). J. Dairy Sci. 46, 686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, C. E., Annison, E. F. & Linzell, J.L. (1967). Biochem. J. 102, 23 P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar