Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T01:18:16.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prediction of sheep milk chemical composition using milk yield, pH, electrical conductivity and refractive index

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2018

Athanasios I Gelasakis ,
Rebecca Giannakou ,
Georgios E Valergakis ,
Paschalis Fortomaris ,
Antonios Kominakis  and
Georgios Arsenos
Athanasios I Gelasakis*
Affiliation:
Veterinary Research Institute, ELGO-Demeter, Thermi, Thessaloniki, GR 57001, Greece
Rebecca Giannakou
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Animal Husbandry, School of Veterinary Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Box 393, Thessaloniki, GR 54124, Greece
Georgios E Valergakis
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Animal Husbandry, School of Veterinary Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Box 393, Thessaloniki, GR 54124, Greece
Paschalis Fortomaris
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Animal Husbandry, School of Veterinary Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Box 393, Thessaloniki, GR 54124, Greece
Antonios Kominakis
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science and Aquaculture, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos str. Athens, GR 11855, Greece
Georgios Arsenos
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Animal Husbandry, School of Veterinary Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Box 393, Thessaloniki, GR 54124, Greece
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This Research Communication addresses the hypothesis that fat, protein, lactose and total solids content can be predicted using daily milk yield (DMY), pH, electrical conductivity (MEC) and refractive index (RI) of milk as predictors. It also addresses the possibility of these measurements being used for on-farm benchmarking activities towards selecting the highest yielding animals and flocks regarding milk quality traits (MQT). A total of 308 purebred Frizarta ewes were used for the study. From each individual ewe, a composite milk sample was collected. pH, MEC and RI of milk were measured and the samples were assayed for fat, protein, lactose and total solids content, using an automatic infrared milk analyser. The predictive value of DMY, pH, MEC and RI of milk on its MQT was assessed using multiple linear regression analysis. Significant regression equations were produced for all of the studied traits. RI and MEC were significant and reliable predictors for all studied MQT, whereas DMY was a significant predictor for most MQT with the exception of protein content. pH was a marginally significant predictor for some of the MQTs at the initial development of the equations but proved unreliable after bootstraping. Using these equations a number of ewes varying from 75 (for fat) to 97 (for protein) out of the 100 highest MQT yielders were correctly predicted, whereas, none of the ewes out of the 100 lowest MQT yielders was mispredicted as a high yielder for protein-, lactose- and total solids- content. Three out of 100 lowest fat-yielders were mispredicted as high fat-yielders. Similar equations can be used for benchmarking activities towards selecting the highest protein-, fat-, lactose- and total solids- yielding animals and flocks in cases where laboratories for MQT analyses are not readily available or the cost of chemical analyses is high. The method can be regarded as a handy tool for the dairy industry to readily assess milk quality at the farm level.

Keywords

Sheep milk qualityprediction modelpHelectrical conductivityrefractive index
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 85 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 78 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Hannah Dairy Research Foundation 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atasever, S, Erdem, H & Altop, A 2010 Relationships between milk somatic cell count and pH in dairy cows. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 9 1575–1577 Google Scholar
Chigerwe, M & Hagey, JV 2014 Refractometer assessment of colostral and serum IgG and milk total solids concentrations in dairy cattle. BMC Veterinary Research 10 178 Google Scholar
Gelasakis, AI, Valergakis, GE, Arsenos, G & Banos, G 2012 Description and typology of intensive dairy sheep farms in Greece. Journal of Dairy Science 95 3070–3079 Google Scholar
Ikonen, T, Morri, S, Tyrisevä, A-M, Ruotinnen, O & Ojala, M 2004 Genetic and phenotypic correlations between milk coagulation properties, milk production traits, somatic cell count, casein content and pH of milk. Journal of Dairy Science 87 458–467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jääskeläinen, AJ, Peiponen, K-E & Räty, JA 2001 On reflectometric measurement of a refractive index of milk. Journal of Dairy Science 84 38–43 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mabrook, MF & Petty, MC 2003 Effect of composition on the electrical conductance of milk. Journal of Food Engineering 60 321–325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, YW 1991 Interrelationships between somatic cell counts, electrical conductivity, bacteria counts, percent fat and protein in goat milk. Small Ruminant Research 5 367–375 Google Scholar
Yoshida, T, Lopez-Villalobos, N & Holmes, CW 2005 Relationships between milk yield, milk composition and electrical conductivity in dairy cattle. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 65 143–147 Google Scholar
Zywica, R, Banach, JK & Kielczewska, K 2012 An attempt of applying the electrical properties for the evaluation of milk fat content of raw milk. Journal of Food Engineering 111 420–424 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Gelasakis et al. supplementary material

Gelasakis et al. supplementary material 1

Download Gelasakis et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 379.6 KB