Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:39:13.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patterns of intramammary infection and clinical mastitis over a 5 year period in a closely monitored herd applying mastitis control measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. Eric Hillerton ,
A. John Bramley ,
R. Tim Staker  and
Charles H. McKinnon
J. Eric Hillerton
Affiliation:
Milking and Mastitis Centre, Institute for Animal Health, Compton Laboratory, Compton, Newbury RG16 ONN, UK
A. John Bramley
Affiliation:
Milking and Mastitis Centre, Institute for Animal Health, Compton Laboratory, Compton, Newbury RG16 ONN, UK
R. Tim Staker
Affiliation:
Milking and Mastitis Centre, Institute for Animal Health, Compton Laboratory, Compton, Newbury RG16 ONN, UK
Charles H. McKinnon
Affiliation:
Milking and Mastitis Centre, Institute for Animal Health, Compton Laboratory, Compton, Newbury RG16 ONN, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The udder health of a research herd of between 160 and 220 Friesian cows run on a commercial basis has been monitored closely, including detailed bacteriological study, over 5 years. The five point mastitis control plan had been in use for several years prior to this study and was continued with minor alterations to the management of the plan, more detailed bacteriological monitoring and increased encouragement to apply it. It has proved possible to make a substantial improvement in the udder health of the herd. The percentage of infected cows fell from 21·9 to 12·0 and the percentage of infected quarters from 7·3 to 3·3. The main benefit has been a drastic reduction in the rate of clinical and subclinical mastitis caused by coagulase-positive staphylococci. However the total incidence of clinical mastitis did not change substantially, averaging around 30 cases/100 cows per year. This was largely because environmental mastitis organisms were responsible for 65 % of all clinical cases. The results showed marked differences in the patterns of infection due to the environmental mastitis pathogens, Gram-negative bacteria and aesculin-hydrolysing streptococci, suggesting different mechanisms of invasion of the gland.

Type
Original articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 39 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beck, H. S., Wise, W. S. & Dodd, F. H. 1992 Cost benefit analysis of bovine mastitis in the UK. Journal of Dairy Research 59 449–460CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bentley, R. W., Leigh, J. A. & Collins, M. D. 1993 The development and use of species-specific oligonucleotide probes for the differentiation of Streptococcus uberis and Streptococcus parauberis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 31 57–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blowey, R. W. 1986 An assessment of the economic benefits of a mastitis control scheme. Veterinary Record 119 551–553CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Booth, J. M. 1988 Progress in controlling mastitis in England and Wales. Veterinary Record 122 299–302CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bramley, A. J. 1982 Sources of Streptococcus uberis in the dairy herd. 1. Isolation from bovine faeces and from straw bedding of cattle. Journal of Dairy Research 49 369–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bramley, A. J. 1985 The control of coliform mastitis. Proceedings, Annual Meeting, National Mastitis Council 24 4–17Google Scholar
Bramley, A. J., Godinho, K. S. & Grindal, R. J. 1981 Evidence of penetration of the bovine teat duct by Escherichia coli in the interval between milkings. Journal of Dairy Research 48 379–386CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bramley, A. J. & Neave, F. K. 1975 Studies on the control of coliform mastitis in dairy cows. British Veterinary Journal 131 160–169CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
British Standards Institution 1988 Milking machine installations. Specification for construction and performance. London: BSI (BS 5545 Part 2)Google Scholar
Dodd, F. H., Griffin, T. K. & Morant, S. V. 1985 The diagnosis of infectious mastitis in surveys and farmscale experiments. Kieler Milchtvirtschaftliche Forschungberichte 37 261–266Google Scholar
Dodd, F. H. & Neave, F. K. 1970 Mastitis control. National Institute for Research in Dairying Biennial Reviews 21–60Google Scholar
Grindal, R. J. & Hillerton, J. E. 1991 Influence of milk flow rate on new intramammary infection in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 58 263–268CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grindal, R. J., Walton, A. W. & Hillerton, J. E. 1991 Influence of milk flow rate and streak canal length on new intramammary infection in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 58 383–388CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillerton, J. E., Bramley, A. J. & Watson, C. A. 1987 The epidemiology of summer mastitis; a survey of clinical cases. British Veterinary Journal 143 520–530CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillerton, J. E., Shearn, M. F. H., Teverson, R. M., Langridge, S. & Booth, J. M. 1993 Effect of pre- milking teat dipping on clinical mastitis on dairy farms in England. Journal of Dairy Research 60 31–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Dairy Federation 1981 Laboratory methods for use in mastitis work. Brussels: IDF (International Dairy Federation Bulletin no. 132)Google Scholar
Kruze, J. & Bramley, A. J. 1982 Sources of Streptococcus uberis in the dairy herd. 2. Evidence of colonization of the bovine intestine by Streptococcus uberis. Journal of Dairy Research 49 375–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meaney, W. J. & Egan, J. 1987 Summer mastitis in Irish dairy herds. In Summer Mastitis, Workshop, 1986, pp. 10–13 (Eds Thomas, G., Over, H. J., Vecht, U. and Nansen, P.). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff (Current Topics in Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science 45)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pankey, J. W., Drechsler, P. A. & Wildman, E. E. 1991 Mastitis prevalence in primigravid heifers at parturition. Journal of Dairy Science 74 1550–1552CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, T. C., Jackson, E. R. & Marr, A. 1983 Within herd comparison of teat dipping and dry cow therapy with only selective dry cow therapy in six herds. Veterinary Record 112 315–319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shearn, M. F. H. 1983 Automatic exit rate teat disinfection. Shinfield, Reading: National Institute for Research in Dairying (NIRD Leaflet no. 5669)Google Scholar
Strandberg, E. & Shook, G. E. 1989 Genetic and economic responses to breeding programmes that consider mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 72 2136–2142CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilesmith, J. W., Francis, P. G. & Wilson, C. D. 1986 Incidence of clinical mastitis in a cohort of British dairy herds. Veterinary Record 118 199–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, C. D. & Kingwill, R. G. 1975 A practical mastitis control routine. International Dairy Federation Annual Bulletin no. 85 422–438Google Scholar