Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:57:27.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutritional value of lactose-hydrolysed milk: protein quality after some industrial processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. Burvall ,
N.-G. Asp ,
A. Dahlqvist  and
R. Öste
A. Burvall
Affiliation:
Applied Nutrition, Department of Food Science, Chemical Centre, University of Lund, S-220 07 Lund 7, Sweden
N.-G. Asp
Affiliation:
Applied Nutrition, Department of Food Science, Chemical Centre, University of Lund, S-220 07 Lund 7, Sweden
A. Dahlqvist
Affiliation:
Applied Nutrition, Department of Food Science, Chemical Centre, University of Lund, S-220 07 Lund 7, Sweden
R. Öste
Affiliation:
Applied Nutrition, Department of Food Science, Chemical Centre, University of Lund, S-220 07 Lund 7, Sweden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The nutritional protein quality of lactose-hydrolysed milk after some industrial processes was studied with N balance experiments on growing rats.

Ultra-high-temperature sterilization and evaporation at 25 °C did not influence the nutritional value significantly, whereas spray-drying under conditions usually used for ordinary milk gave a considerable reduction in protein quality. This was caused mainly or entirely by loss of biologically availabe lysine.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , October 1977 , pp. 549 - 553
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bender, A. E. (1973). In Proteins in human nutrition, p. 167. (Eds Porter, J. W. G. and Rolls, B. A..) London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bouvy, F. A. M. (1975). Food Product Development 9 (2), 10.Google Scholar
Dahlqvist, A. (1974). In Sugars in nutrition, p. 189. (Eds Sipple, H. L. and McNutt, K. W.) New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dahlqvist, A., Asp, N.-G., Burvall, A. & Rausing, H. (1977). Journal of Dairy Research 44, 541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlqvist, A., Mattiasson, B. & Mosbach, K. (1973). Biotechnology and Bioengineering 15, 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donoso, G., Lewis, O. A. M., Miller, D. S. & Payne, P. R. (1962). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 13, 192.Google Scholar
Eggum, B. O. (1973). Beretning fra Forsogslaboratoriet Statens Husdyrbrugsudvalg, Copenhagen. no. 406.Google Scholar
Forsum, E., Hambraeus, L. & Siddiqi, I. H. (1973). Nutrition Reports International 8, 39.Google Scholar
Kosikowski, F. V. & Wierzbicki, L. E. (1973). Journal of Dairy Science 56, 146.Google Scholar
Kretchmer, N. (1972). Scientific American 227 (4), 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, E. L., Carpenter, K. J. & Milner, C. K. (1965). British Journal of Nutrition 19, 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olling, C. J. (1972). Annales de Technologic Agricole 21, 343.Google Scholar
Pronczuk, A., Pawlowska, D. & Bartnik, J. (1973). Nutrition and Metabolism 15, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
San José, C., Asp, N.-G., Burvall, A. & Dahlquist, A. (1977). Journal of Dairy Science (in the Press).Google Scholar
Woodruff, C. W. (1976). Nutrition Reviews 34, 33.Google Scholar
Woychick, J. H., Wondolowski, M. V. & Dahl, K. J. (1974). In Immobilized enzymes in food and microbial processes, p. 41. (Eds Olson, A. C. and Cooney, C. L..) New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar