Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:51:16.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mineral balance in skim-milk and milk retentate: effect of physicochemical characteristics of the aqueous phase

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Gerard Brule  and
Jacques Fauquant
Gerard Brule
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Laboratoire de Recherches de Technologie Laitière, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France
Jacques Fauquant
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Laboratoire de Recherches de Technologie Laitière, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effect of physicochemical characteristics (pH, temperature, composition) of the aqueous phase on the mineral balance in milk and milk retentate has been studied. The ratio of colloidal Ca to total protein decreased with pH, but at any given pH the higher the protein concentration, the higher was the ratio of colloidal Ca to total protein. The solubilization of Ca during cooling and the decrease in soluble Ca during heating were approximately the same in retentates and in milk. Among the components of the aqueous phase, soluble Ca and citrate ions were related to the amount of colloidal Ca.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , February 1981 , pp. 91 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brulé, G., Real Del Sol, E., Fauquant, J. & Fiaud, C. (1978). Journal of Dairy Science 61, 1225–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brulé, G., Maubois, J. -L. & Fauquant, J. (1974). Lait 54, 600–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchheim, W. & Prokopek, D. (1976). Milchwissenschaft 31, 462–465.Google Scholar
Buchheim, W. & Welsch, U. (1973). Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 27, 163–180.Google Scholar
Davies, D. T. & White, J. C. D. (1960). Journal of Dairy Research 27, 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downey, W. K. & Murphy, R. F. (1970). Journal of Dairy Research 37, 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, P. F. & Morrissey, P. A. (1977). Journal of Dairy Research 44, 627–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, M. (1973). Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 27, 278–285.Google Scholar
Green, M. L. & Marshall, R. J. (1977). Journal of Dairy Research 44, 521–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, C. & Muir, D. D. (1979). Journal of Dairy Research 46, 433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenness, R. & Koops, J. (1962). Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 16, 153–164.Google Scholar
Pearce, K. N. (1976). Journal of Dairy Research 43, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. & Tessier, H. (1959). Journal of Dairy Science 42, 969–980:CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, D. G., Koops, J. & Westerbeek, D. (1977). Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 31, 328–341.Google Scholar
Slattery, C. W. (1976). Journal of Dairy Science 59, 1547–1556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vujicic, I. & DeMan, J. M. (1966). Milchwissenschaft 21, 346–349.Google Scholar