Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:37:09.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Milk production in dairy goats supplemented with different levels of ruminally protected methionine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2016

Erick Alonso-Mélendez
Affiliation:
Maestría en Ciencias de la Producción y de la Salud Animal, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D.F., 04510, México
Germán D. Mendoza*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Agrícola y Animal, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Xochimilco, México D.F. 04960, México
Francisco A. Castrejón-Pineda
Affiliation:
Maestría en Ciencias de la Producción y de la Salud Animal, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D.F., 04510, México
Andrés E. Ducoing-Watty
Affiliation:
Maestría en Ciencias de la Producción y de la Salud Animal, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D.F., 04510, México
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The objective of the study reported in this Research Communication was to evaluate graded levels of ruminally protected methionine (RPM) in dairy goat rations on milk production and live weight changes during 155 d of lactation. Twenty-five primiparous dairy goats (crosses of Toggenburg, French Alpine and Saanen; 45·4 ± 1·0 kg BW) were fed a basal diet (10·10% CP, 6·13 DP and 2·34 Mcal/kg ME) of corn silage, oat hay, alfalfa hay and concentrate (80% forage, 20% concentrate). After kidding, the treatments, which consisted of four oral doses of ruminally protected methionine (RPM) at 0, 1, 2 and 3 g/d, were randomly assigned to the goats. The experiment was conducted for 110 d with measurements of milk production and composition, body weight and dry matter intake. No treatment effects were detected in milk production and composition. However, goats with RPM showed a positive live weight changes during lactation which were improved as dose was increased (linear P < 0·01) whereas goats without RPM showed weight loss during the experiment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Qaisi, MA & Titi, HH 2014 Effect of rumen-protected methionine on production and composition of early lactating Shami goats milk and growth performance of their kids. Archiv Tierzucht 57 111Google Scholar
AOAC 1999 Official Methods of Analysis, 16th edn. Arlington, VA, USA: Association of Official Analytical ChemistsGoogle Scholar
Flores, A, Mendoza, G, Pinos-Rodríguez, JM, Plata, F, Vega, S & Bárcena, R 2009 Effects of rumen-protected methionine on milk production of dairy goats. Italian Journal of Animal Science 8 271275Google Scholar
Harpaz, S 2005 L-carnitine and its attributed functions in fish culture and nutrition. A review. Aquaculture 249 321Google Scholar
Kikusato, M, Sudo, S & Toyomizu, M 2015 Methionine deficiency leads to hepatic fat accretion via impairment of fatty acid import by carnitine palmitoyltransferase I. British Poultry Science 56 225231Google Scholar
Konyali, A, Sitki, B & Yurdabak, S 2010 Effect of estrus synchronization on dairy goat milk composition. African Journal of Agricultural Research 5 681684Google Scholar
Lara, A, Mendoza, GD, Landois, LA, Bárcena, R, Sánchez, T, Rojo, R, Ayala, J & Vega, S 2006 Milk production in Holstein cows supplemented with different levels of ruminally protected methionine. Livestock Science 105 105108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lara, BA, Mendoza, GD, Bárcena, R & Landois, L 2003 In situ and in vitro ruminal degradability of protected methionine. Técnica Pecuaria México 41 91103Google Scholar
Lobley, GE, Connell, A & Revell, D 1996 The importance of transmethylation reactions to methionine metabolism in sheep: effects of supplementation with creatine and choline. British Journal of Nutrition 75 4756Google Scholar
Madsen, TG, Nielsen, L & Nielsen, MO 2005 Mammary nutrient uptake in response to dietary supplementation of rumen protected lysine and methionine in late and early lactating dairy goats. Small Ruminant Research 56 151164Google Scholar
NRC 2007 Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids. Washington, DC: The National Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Pissios, P, Hong, S, Kennedy, AR, Prasad, D, Liu, FF & Maratos-Flier, E 2013 Methionine and choline regulate the metabolic phenotype of a ketogenic diet. Molecular Metabolism 2 306313Google Scholar
Poljičak-Milas, N & Marenjak, TS 2007 Dietary supplement of the rumen protected methionine and milk yield in dairy goats. Archiv Tierzucht 50 273278Google Scholar
Salama, AAK, Caja, G, Albanell, E, Such, Z, Casals, R & Plaixats J, 2003 Effects of dietary supplements of zinc-methionine on milk production, udder health and zinc metabolism in dairy goats. Journal of Dairy Research 70 917Google Scholar
Sall, J, Lehman, A, Stephens, M & Creighton, L 2012 JMP® Start Statistics: A Guide to Statistics and Data Analysis. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute IncGoogle Scholar
Steel, GDR, Torrie, JH & Dickey, DA 1997 Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Thumelin, S, Esser, V, Charvy, D, Kolodziej, M, Zammit, VA, McGarry, D, Girard, J & Pegorier, JP 1994 Expression of liver carnitine palmitoyltransferase I and II genes during development in the rat. Biochemical Journal 300 583587Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB & Lewis, BA 1991 Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and nonstarch carbohydrates in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74 35833597Google Scholar
Zhan, XA, Li, JX, Xu, ZR & Zhao, RQ 2006 Effects of methionine and betaine supplementation on growth performance, carcase composition and metabolism of lipids in male broilers. British Poultry Science 47 576580Google Scholar