Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:38:29.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hyperkeratosis of the teat duct orifice in the dairy cow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Martin F. H. Shearn
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Health, Compton Laboratory, Compton, Newbury RG20 7NN, UK
J. Eric Hillerton
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Health, Compton Laboratory, Compton, Newbury RG20 7NN, UK

Summary

Teat orifice hyperkeratosis, a commonly observed condition in dairy cows, has been considered a consequence of machine milking and the degree of hyperkeratosis may be increased by a poor milking system. A fully illustrated technique is described which uses a scoring system from 0 for a perfect orifice to 5 for an orifice significantly enlarged with extensively protruding fronds of teat duct keratin. A range of scores found in 25 commercial dairy herds is presented. The scores have been averaged for each cow and the markedly skewed distribution corrected by a square root transformation. This scoring procedure allows comparative measures of hyperkeratosis within and between herds. An 8-fold difference (0·17–1·31) in herd average score was found. Within all herds the score increased with lactational age of the animals and peaked, for any lactation, some 3–4 months post partum, declining as the animals dried off. There was no significant relationship between mean somatic cell count and degree of hyperkeratosis at the herd level. This implies that such chronic pathological changes are unlikely to be related to the level of intramammary infection. It appeared that some hyperkeratosis is an obvious and probably natural response to milking and occurs in a significant proportion of animals in all herds although often only to a slight degree. Much more hyperkeratosis may be a measure of the performance and management of the herd. The genetic influence is unknown. Higher yielding cows will score higher as they milk for longer, but generally high scores may reflect consistent and possibly considerable overmilking. Hyperkeratosis may be an indicator of the quality of management and show the level of attention being paid to the welfare of the herd.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

British Standards Institution 1988 Milking machine installations. 2. Specification for construction and performance. London: BSI (BS 5545 Part 2)Google Scholar
Francis, P. G. 1981 Teat lesions and machine milking. In Mastitis Control and Herd Management, pp. 237250 (Eds Bramley, A. J., Dodd, F. H. and Griffin, T. K.). Shinfield: National Institute for Research in Dairying (NIBD Technical Bulletin no. 4)Google Scholar
Frei, W. 1972 Allgemeine Pathologic für Tierärzte und Studierende der Tiermedizin. Hamburg: Paul PareyGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, J. J., Murdough, P. A., Howard, A. B., Drechsler, P. A., Pankey, J. W., Ledbetter, G. A., Day, L. L. & Day, J. D. 1994 Winter evaluation of a postmilking powdered teat dip. Journal of Dairy Science 77 748758CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Dairy Federation 1987 Machine Milking and Mastitis. Brussels: IDF (International Dairy Federation Bulletin no. 215)Google Scholar
Kingwill, R. G., Dodd, F. H. & Neave, F. K. 1977 Machine milking and mastitis. In Machine Milking, pp. 231285 (Eds Thiel, C. C. and Dodd, F. H.). Shinfield: National Institute for Research in Dairying (NIRD Technical Bulletin no. 1)Google Scholar
Logan, E. F. 1993 Introducing a national mastitis control programme. Proceedings, British Mastitis Conference, pp. 5061Google Scholar
Mein, G. A. & Thompson, P. D. 1993 Milking the 30,000-pound herd. Journal of Dairy Science 76 32943300CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michel, G., Seffner, W. & Schulz, J. 1974 [The problem of hyperkeratosis of the teat duct epithelium in cattle.] Monatshefte für Veterinärmedizin 29 570574Google Scholar
Rathore, A. K. 1977 Teat shape and production associated with opening and prolapse of the teat orifice in Friesian cows. British Veterinary Journal 133 258262CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sieber, R. L. 1979 Bovine Teat End Lesions: the prevalence and relationship to mastitis and machine milking. Unpublished MS thesis, University of Minnesota, St PaulGoogle Scholar
Sieber, R. L. & Farnsworth, R. J. 1981 Prevalence of chronic teat-end lesions and their relationship to intramammary infection in 22 herds of dairy cattle. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 178 12631267Google ScholarPubMed