Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:51:05.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth studies on the lactic streptococci: III. Observations on continuous growth behaviour in reconstituted skim-milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. R. Keen
A. R. Keen
Affiliation:
New Zealand Dairy Research Institute, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The behaviour of Streptococcus cremoris AM1 and AM2, and Streptococcus lactis ML8 in continuous growth in reconstituted skim-milk medium under controlled conditions of pH has been investigated.

At 20°C under aerobic conditions small quantities of oxygen were found to stimulate the growth rate of Str. lactis ML8 between pH 5·05 and 5·45. Growth between pH 5·45 and 6·35 became erratic due to the accumulation of hydrogen peroxide. Above pH 6·35 hydrogen peroxide could not be detected in the continuously growing culture and below pH 5·05 the growth rate of the culture was not affected by small quantities of oxygen. An effect of direct oxygen toxicity on growth, distinct from that of hydrogen peroxide accumulation, was observed over the limited pH range investigated. After 48 h growth in the presence of small concentrations of oxygen the effect disappeared.

At 30°C under anaerobic conditions a region in the dilution rate curves was observed with Str. cremoris AM1 and AM2 and Str. lactis ML8 which suggested the occurrence of a growth-limiting component. This region of slow growth could be correlated with diminished soluble nitrogen values, and was eliminated by enrichment of the medium with soluble nitrogen.

An unusual feature of the investigation was the dilution rates, indicative of extremely fast specific growth rates, experienced for Str. lactis ML8. It was thought unlikely that wall growth contributed appreciably to the dilution rate as a similar phenomenon was not observed with Str. cremoris AM1 or AM2.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , February 1972 , pp. 151 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anders, R. F., Hogg, D. M. & Jago, G. R. (1970). Appl. Microbiol. 19, 608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, T. R., Airey, F. K., Leedham, L. F. & Gomm, R. J. (1959). 15th Int. Dairy Congr., London 2, 605.Google Scholar
Berridge, N. J. (1966). J. Soc. Dairy Technol. 19, 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citti, J. E., Sandine, W. E. & Elliker, P. R. (1965). J. Dairy Sci. 48, 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsworth, R., Telling, R. C. & East, D. N. (1959). J.appl. Bact. 22, 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. G. T. (1965). Lab. Pract. 14, 1168.Google Scholar
Garrison, E. R. & Patrick, T. E. (1966). J. Dairy Sci. 49, 442.Google Scholar
Gilliland, S. E. (1969). J. Dairy Sci. 52, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilliland, S. E. & Speck, M. L. (1969). Appl. Microbiol. 17, 797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, R. J. (1965). J. Bact. 90, 1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, D., Elsworth, R. & Telling, R. C. (1956). J. gen. Microbiol. 14, 601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakovlev, D. & Shmeleva, L. (1966). 17th Int. Dairy Congr., Munich C, 375.Google Scholar
Karush, F., Iacocca, V. F. & Harris, T. N. (1956). J. Bact. 72, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keen, A. R. (1972 a). J. Dairy Res. 39, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keen, A. R. (1972 b). J. Dairy Res. 39, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, D. H. & Dimmick, R. L. (1964). J. Bact. 88, 1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novick, A. (1955). A. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, R. B. (1966). Biotechnol. Bioengng 8, 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pont, E. G. & Holloway, G. L. (1968). Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 23, 22.Google Scholar
Powell, E. O. (1956). J. gen. Microbiol. 15, 492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shmeleva, L. & Jakovlev, D. (1966 a). 17th Int. Dairy Congr., Munich C, 367.Google Scholar
Shmeleva, L., Novotel'nov, N. & Yakovlev, D. (1964 a). Moloch. Prom. 25 (1), 8.Google Scholar
(Dairy Sci. Abstr. 1964, 26, 227.)Google Scholar
Shmeleva, L., Novotel'nov, N. & Yakovlev, D. (1964 b). Moloch. Prom. 25 (12), 17.Google Scholar
(Dairy Sci. Abstr. 1965, 27, 129.)Google Scholar
Shmeleva, L., Novotel'nov, N. & Yakovlev, D. (1964 c). Moloch. Prom. 25 (8), 31.Google Scholar
(Dairy Sci. Abstr. 1964, 26, 533).Google Scholar
Simonsen, B. (1964). Thesis, University of Oregon Dental School.Google Scholar
Wilkowske, H. H. & Fouts, E. L. (1958). J. Dairy Sci. 41, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar