Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:42:46.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and proteinase production in Pseudomonas spp. cultivated under various conditions of temperature and nutrition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

H. S. Juffs ,
A. C. Hayward  and
H. W. Doelle
H. S. Juffs
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, University of Queensland, Medical School, Herston 4006, Brisbane, Australia
A. C. Hayward
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, University of Queensland, Medical School, Herston 4006, Brisbane, Australia
H. W. Doelle
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, University of Queensland, Medical School, Herston 4006, Brisbane, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A study was made of the formation of the extracellular proteolytic enzymes during the growth cycle of several species of Pseudomonas cultivated under different conditions of temperature and nutrition. Proteolytic activity was not proportional to growth. Expressed per unit of cell dry weight, the proteolytic activity showed a peak in the early logarithmic phase which was greater in cultures grown at 3 than at 28°C. Proteolytic enzyme was not formed in the absence of organic nitrogen. Of 16 organisms studied, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 10145 was the most prolific producer of proteolytic enzyme.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , October 1968 , pp. 385 - 393
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anson, M. L. (1938). J. gen. Physiol. 22, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folin, O. & Ciocalteau, J. (1927). J. biol. Chem. 73, 627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, I. J. & Chambers, A. K. (1966). Can. J. Microbiol. 12, 1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morihara, K. (1957). Bull, agric. chem. Soc. Japan 21, 11.Google Scholar
Morihara, K. (1963). Biochim. biophys. Acta 73, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, A. C. & Gunderson, M. F. (1960). Appl. Microbiol. 8, 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, M. R. (1962). In The Bacteria. Vol. IV. The Physiology of Growth, pp. 121–170. (Eds. Gunsalus, I. and Stanier, R..) New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rick, W. (1963). In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, pp. 800–6. (Ed. Bergmeyer, H..) New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Skerman, V. B. D. (1959). In A Guide to the Identification of the Genera of Bacteria, 1st edn, pp. 61–2. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Co.Google Scholar
Van der Zant, W. C. (1957). Fd Res. 22, 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar