Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:26:34.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further studies on the effects of dietary cottonseed oil on milk-fat secretion in the cow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

W. Steele  and
J. H. Moore
W. Steele
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University, Reading
J. H. Moore
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of the isocaloric replacement of part of the dietary concentrate mixture by cottonseed oil on the yield and composition of the milk fat and on the pattern of rumen fermentation was investigated in 2 feeding experiments with a total of 8 cows in mid-lactation. The concentrate mixtures were given with high- or low-roughage diets that supplied 9·1 or 1·8 kg of hay/day.

In expt 1 the yield of milk fat was not altered by the addition of 10% cottonseed oil to the concentrate mixtures given either with the high- or with the low-levels of dietary roughage. On the low-roughage treatment, dietary cottonseed oil increased milk yield but reduced the fat content of the milk. The change from the high- to the low-roughage diets containing no cottonseed oil resulted in reductions in the yield and percentage of fat in the milk. In expt 2 the yields of milk and milk fat were similar irrespective of whether the concentrate mixture contained 5 or 10% cottonseed oil.

In expt 1 the inclusion of 10% cottonseed oil in the concentrate mixture reduced the yields and percentages of the medium-chain fatty acids (12:0, 14:0 and 16:0) and increased the yields and percentages of the C18 fatty acids in the milk fat. In expt 2, when the concentrate mixture contained 5% cottonseed oil, the yields and percentages of all the fatty acids in the milk fat were similar to the values obtained when the concentrates contained 10% cottonseed oil. For any given concentrate mixture, the change from the high- to the low-roughage treatments in both expts 1 and 2 resulted in increases in the percentage of oleic acid in the milk fat. The highest concentration of trans-octadecenoic acid was observed in the milk fat of the cows when they were given the high-roughage diet with the concentrate mixture containing 10% cottonseed oil.

In expt 2 the level of cottonseed oil in the concentrate mixture did not influence the pattern of rumen fermentation as measured by the concentrations of the various volatile fatty acids in the rumen liquor. However, the change from the high- to the low-roughage diets reduced the proportion of acetic and increased the proportions of propionic and n-valeric acids in the total volatile fatty acids in the rumen liquor.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , October 1968 , pp. 343 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, N. N. (1934). J. Dairy Sci. 17, 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, N. N. & Fitch, J. B. (1941). J. Dairy Sci. 24, 516.Google Scholar
Annison, E. F., Linzell, J. L., Fazakerley, S. & Nichols, B. W. (1967). Biochem. J. 102, 637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, W. H., Stull, J. W. & Stott, G. H. (1962). J. Dairy Sci. 45, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental Designs, 2nd edn.London: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Davis, R. N. & Harland, F. G. (1946). J. Dairy Sci. 29, 839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R. E. (1960). Bull. Minist. Agric. Fish. Fd, Lond. no. 48.Google Scholar
Farquhar, J. W., Insull, W., Rosen, P., Stoffel, W. & Ahrens, E. H. (1959). Nutr. Rev. 17, suppl.Google Scholar
Garner, F. H. & Sanders, H. G. (1938). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 28, 541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, A. T. & Martin, A. J. P. (1952). Biochem. J. 50, 679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linzell, J. L., Annison, E. F., Fazakerley, S. & Leng, R. A. (1967). Biochem. J. 104, 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markham, R. (1942). Biochem. J. 36, 790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J. H. & Steele, W. (1968). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 27, 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, L. J. (1962). Chemy Ind. p. 1238.Google Scholar
Peeters, G. & Lauryssens, M. (1964). In Metabolism and Physiological Significance of Lipids, p. 351. (Eds. Dawson, R. M. C. and Rhodes, D. N..) London: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Raun, N. S. & Burroughs, W. (1962). J. Anim. Sci. 21, 454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. (1961). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 23, 251.Google Scholar
Steele, W. & Moore, J. H. (1968). J. Dairy Res. 35, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoffel, W., Chu, F. & Ahrens, E. H. (1959). Analyt. Chem. 31, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tove, S. B. & Mochrie, R. D. (1963). J. Dairy Sci. 46, 686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, P. F. V., Scott, T. W. & Dawson, R. M. C. (1964). Biochem. J. 92, 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youssef, F. G. & Allen, D. M. (1966). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 17, 536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar