Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:18:52.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A freeze-fracture study of tight junction structure in sheep mammary gland epithelium during pregnancy and lactation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Geoffrey Morgan  and
F. B. Peter Wooding
Geoffrey Morgan
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Physiology, Babraham, Cambridge CB2 4 AT, UK
F. B. Peter Wooding
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Physiology, Babraham, Cambridge CB2 4 AT, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Freeze fractures of the tight junctions at the apices of sheep mammary secretory cells showed that the junction at 72 d of pregnancy was significantly wider than at any later stage. The number of ridges in the junction only increased significantly between 122 and 142 d of pregnancy. The initially even distribution of intramembrane particles across the tight junction changed gradually until in the fully lactating animal there were far more particles on the lateral surface of the plasmalemma. Possible correlations between these changes, the alterations in permeability of the mammary epithelium, and the differences in hormone levels are briefly discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , February 1982 , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akers, R. M. & Heald, C. W. 1978 Stimulatory effect of prepartum milk removal on secretory cell differentiation in the bovine mammary gland. Journal of infrastructure Research 63 316–322Google ScholarPubMed
Chatterton, R. T., Harris, J. A. & Wynn, R. M. 1975 Lactogenesis in the rat: an ultrastructural study of the initiation of the secretory process. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 43 479–484Google Scholar
Chevalier, J., Bourguet, J. & Hugon, J. S. 1974 Membrane associated particles: distribution in frog urinary bladder epithelium at rest and after oxytocin treatment. Cell and Tissue Research 152 129–140CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claude, P. & Goodenough, D. A. 1973 Fracture faces of zonulae occludentes from ‘tight’ and ‘leaky’ epithelia, Journal of Cell Biology 58 390–400CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falconer, I. R. 1980 Aspects of the biochemistry, physiology and endocrinology of lactation. Australian Journal of Biological Science 33 71–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartmann, P. E., Trevethan, P. & Shelton, J. N. 1973 Progesterone and oestrogen and the initiation of lactation in ewes. Journal of Endocrinology 59 249–259Google Scholar
Hoi Sang, Ü., Saier, M. H. & Ellisman, M. H. 1979 Tight junction formation is closely linked to the polar redistribution of intramembrane particles in aggregating MDCK epithelium. Experimental Cell Research 122 384–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. S., Morgan, G. & Wooding, F. B. P. 1979 Mitochondria and mitochondria-tonofilament-desmosomal associations in the mammary gland secretory epithelium of lactating cows. Journal of Cell Science 38 125–135CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linzell, J. L. & Peaker, M. 1971 Mechanism of milk secretion. Physiological Reviews 51 564–597Google Scholar
Linzell, J. L. & Peaker, M. 1974 Changes in colostrum composition and in the permeability of the mammary epithelium at about the time of parturition in the goat. Journal of Physiology 243 129–151CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez-Palomo, A. & Erlij, D. 1975 Structure of tight junctions in epithelia with different permeability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 72 4487–4491Google Scholar
Mollgard, K., Lauritzen, B. & Saunders, N. R. 1979 Double replica technique applied to choroid plexus from early foetal sheep–completeness and complexity of tight junctions. Journal of Neurocytology 8 139–149CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pitelka, D. R., Hamamoto, S. T., Duafala, J. G. & Nemanic, M. K. 1973 Cell contacts in the mouse mammary gland I. Normal gland in postnatal development and the secretory cycle. Journal of Cell Biology 56 797–818CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Deurs, B. & Luft, J. H. 1979 Effect of glutaraldehyde fixation on the structure of tight junctions: a quantitative freeze-fracture analysis. Journal of iUltrastructure Research 68 160–172CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wooding, F. B. P. 1977 Comparative mammary fine structure. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 41 1–41Google Scholar