Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:27:52.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flavour defects in edible casein and skim-milk powder: I. The role of Maillard browning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

N. J. Walker
Affiliation:
New Zealand Dairy Research Institute, Palmerston North, New Zealand

Summary

Two chemical tests were used to measure the extent of lactose degradation by Maillard browning in casein and skim-milk powder during storage. At the same time these products were evaluated organoleptically. Highly significant correlations between age, flavour score and level of browning in skim-milk powder were in contrast to the lack of any relationship between the flavour score or age of casein and its level of browning. Maillard browning occurring during storage of skim-milk powder was accompanied by increasing levels of cereal and malty flavours. A stale flavour, which closely resembled the musty flavour common to casein, was not observed in skim-milk powder until after storage for 9 months. A distinct difference in the flavour stability of rennet casein and acid casein could not be accounted for in terms of the relative extent of lactose degradation. Evaluation of casein samples with different lactose contents suggested that Maillard browning does not contribute to flavour defects during storage unless the curd is so insufficiently washed during manufacture as to produce an abnormally high level of lactose in the dried product.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bassette, R. & Keeney, M. (1960). J. Dairy Sci. 43, 1744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, R. A. & McFarlane, W. D. (1945). Can. J. Res. 23B, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, R. P., Koncus, A. F., Cherrey, G. & Remaley, R. J. (1953). J. Milk Fd Technol. 16, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Monica, E. S., Craig, J. C. & Calhoun, M. J. (1968). J. Dairy Sci. 51, 352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, K. M., Kon, S. K., Lea, C. H. & White, J. C. D. (1948). J. Dairy Res. 15, 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, J. E. (1953). J. agric. Fd Chem. 1, 928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeney, M. & Bassette, R. (1959). J. Dairy Sci. 42, 945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumetat, K., Beeby, R. & Morris, A. K. (1956). Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 11, 113.Google Scholar
Lane, J. H. & Eynon, L. (1923). J. Soc. chem. Ind., Lond. 42, 32T.Google Scholar
Lawrence, A. J. (1968). Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 23, 103.Google Scholar
Lea, C. H. (1947). Analyst, Lond. 72, 336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowall, F. H. & Dolby, R. M. (1935). J. Dairy Res. 6, 243.Google Scholar
Mayer, G. L. (1970). Diss. Abstr. B 30, 5549.Google Scholar
Muller, L. L. (1971). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 33, 659.Google Scholar
Ramshaw, E. H. & Dunstone, E. A. (1969 a). J. Dairy Res. 36, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramshaw, E. H. & Dunstone, E. A. (1969 b). J. Dairy Res. 36, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar