Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:33:48.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The feed intake and performance of dairy cows fed on cut grass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

R. J. Halley  and
B. M. Dougall
R. J. Halley
Affiliation:
Seal-Hayne Agricultural College, Newton Abbot, Devon
B. M. Dougall
Affiliation:
Seal-Hayne Agricultural College, Newton Abbot, Devon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In the years 1959, 1960 and 1961 sections of the College herd of pedigree Guernsey cows were fed indoors on cut grass. The grass, cut twice each day, was fed in excess of appetite.

The weight of grass dry matter consumed varied significantly in each year with the percentage of dry matter in the grass. In one year only did the dry-matter consumption vary significantly with the percentage of crude fibre in the grass.

The weight of drinking water consumed varied significantly with the percentage of dry matter in the grass. The total water intake, i.e. drinking water plus uncombined water in the grass, remained almost constant at approximately 14 gal per cow per day.

The use of a concentrate supplement in 1960 and 1961 produced small increases in yield which were not statistically significant. If, however, the differences recorded were real, then they would have been economic in one year and not in the other.

The intake of starch equivalent, calculated from the chemical analyses of the grass, could not be reconciled with the performance of the cows.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , October 1962 , pp. 241 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaxter, K. L. (1959). Scientific Principles of Feeding Farm Livestock, p. 21. London: Farmer and Stock-Breeder Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Campbell, I. L. & Mumford, R. E. (1957). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 17, 25.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E., Drysdale, A. D. & Watson, J. N. (1960). J. Dairy Res. 27, 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, J. L. & Boyne, A. W. (1958). J. agric. Sci. 51, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halley, R. J., Dougall, B. M. & Hunt, R. W. T. (1961). Agriculture, 68, 27.Google Scholar
Holmes, W. (1958). J. Yorks agric. Soc. no. 109, 17.Google Scholar
MacLusky, D. S. (1955). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 45.Google Scholar
MacLusky, D. S. (1959). Agriculture, 66, 383.Google Scholar
Pratt, A. D., Davis, R. R. & Conrad, H. R. (1960). J. Dairy Sci. 43, 1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Report of the Committee on Grassland Utilization (1958). London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
't Hart, M. L. (1956). Proc. 7th Int. Grassl. Congr., New Zealand, p. 70.Google Scholar
Watson, S. J. & Nash, M. J. (1960). The Conservation of Grass and Forage Crops, p. 11, 2nd edition. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd Ltd.Google Scholar
Watson, S. J. & Runcie, K. V. (1960). Outlook on Agriculture, 2, 264.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. (1957). Bull. Minist. Agric., Lond., no. 48.Google Scholar