Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:58:37.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors affecting the ethanol stability of bovine skim milk

VII. Lactational and compositional effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

David S. Horne
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute, Ayr KA6 5HL, UK
Thomas G. Parker
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute, Ayr KA6 5HL, UK
William J. Donnelly
Affiliation:
Agricultural Institute, Moorepark Research Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Irish Republic
D. Thomas Davies
Affiliation:
Agricultural Institute, Moorepark Research Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Irish Republic

Summary

Milk samples from three groups of cows were taken at frequent intervals throughout lactation following autumn-, winter- or spring-calving. The ethanol (EtOH) stability/pH profile was determined for each sample and its characteristic parameters calculated. The lactational trends in these parameters were examined. Asymptotic maximum EtOH stability (Smax) was low in early lactation but rose rapidly to a value which showed no further lactational trends. Asymptotic minimum stability (Smin) for samples from autumn- and winter-calving cows showed a decrease which could be associated with the transition to summer grazing but no obvious lactational effects. The slope parameter increased slowly during lactation. The profile pK value decreased in early lactation, but thereafter increased throughout lactation giving the most obvious effect observed in direct measurement, namely an alkaline shift in the profile as lactation progressed. The EtOH stability calculated at a fixed pH of 6·6 passed through a maximum, characteristic for each cow, in the first weeks of lactation but declined steadily thereafter. This behaviour mirrors the lactational behaviour of the soluble salt balance ratio calculated from the original data of White & Davies (1958).

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Davies, D. T. & White, J. C. D. 1958 The relation between the chemical composition of milk and the stability of the caseinate complex. II. Coagulation by ethanol. Journal of Dairy Research 25 256266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, W. J. & Horne, D. S. 1986 Relationship between ethanol stability of bovine milk and natural variations in milk composition. Journal of Dairy Research 53 2333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horne, D. S. 1985 The ethanol stability of milk. Hannah Research 1984 89100. Ayr: Hannah Research InstituteGoogle Scholar
Horne, D. S. & Pabker, T. G. 1980 The pH sensitivity of the ethanol stability of individual cow milks. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 34 126130Google Scholar
Horne, D. S. & Parker, T. G. 1981 a Factors affecting the ethanol stability of bovine milk. I. Effect of serum phase components. Journal of Dairy Research 48 273284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horne, D. S. & Parker, T. G. 1981 b Factors affecting the ethanol stability of bovine milk. II. The origin of the pH transition. Journal of Dairy Research 48 285291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitamura, K. 1937 Studies on the alcohol coagulation of fresh cow milk. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido Imperial University 41 97362Google Scholar
White, J. C. D. & Davies, D. T. 1958 The relation between the chemical composition of milk and the stability of the caseinate complex. I. General introduction, description of samples, methods and chemical composition of samples. Journal of Dairy Research 25 236255CrossRefGoogle Scholar