Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T06:30:56.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect on growth rate and on milk yield and composition of finely grinding the hay and cooking (flaking) the maize in mixed diets for growing and for milking heifers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

C. C. Balch ,
W. H. Broster ,
J. A. F. Rook  and
Valerie J. Tuck
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The volatile fatty acids produced during fermentation in the rumen have been shown to vary in their nutritive properties. Armstrong & Blaxter (1957) found that for lipogenesis in the adult sheep the value of the acids increases with increasing chain length. Rook & Balch (1961) showed that the individual acids have characteristically different effects on the synthesis of the various constituents of milk. In consequence the nature of the end products of fermentation must be one factor affecting the utilization of foods for productive purposes.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , February 1965 , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Annison, E. F. & Lewis, D. (1959). Metabolism in the Rumen. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. & Blaxter, K. L. (1957). Brit. J. Nutr. 11, 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, G. L. & Broster, W. H. (1957). J. agric. Sci. 49, 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, C. C., Johnson, V. W. & Machin, C. (1962). J. agric. Sci. 59, 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, D. A. (1954). Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C, Freer, M. & Balch, C. C. (1963). Brit. J. Nutr. 17, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R. L. & Hemken, R. W. (1962). J. Dairy Sci. 45, 1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, H. L. (1956). J. Dairy Sci. 39, 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, D. J. (1963). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 18, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. (1961). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 23, 251.Google Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. & Balch, C. C. (1961). Brit. J. Nutr. 15, 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, J. C, Ensor, W. L., Tellechea, H. F. & Lee, S. D. (1960). J. Nutr. 71, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, R. N., Jacobson, D. R., Erwin, E. S. & Grainger, R. B. (1962). J. Anim. Sci. 21, 1105.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. (1957). Bull. no. 48 Minist. Agric. Fish. Fd., London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar