Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:50:42.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of hydrogen peroxide on the nutritive value of milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Margaret E. Gregory ,
Kathleen M. Henry ,
S. K. Kon ,
J. W. G. Porter ,
S. Y. Thompson  and
Margaret I. W. Benjamin
Margaret E. Gregory
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Kathleen M. Henry
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
S. K. Kon
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
J. W. G. Porter
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
S. Y. Thompson
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Margaret I. W. Benjamin
Affiliation:
Dairy Department, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Treatment of milk with 0·05% (w/v) H2O2 for 8 h at 24°C had no significant effect on the concentrations of seven of the B-complex vitamins or of the fatsoluble vitamins A and E or of carotene. Rat tests showed that the nutritive value of the milk proteins was slightly reduced. This finding was confirmed by microbiological tests with Streptococcus zymogenes, which also showed that the loss was probably connected with that of methionine. The concentration of H2O2 used was effective in controlling bacterial growth during the incubation period, even in a sample of milk with a high initial bacterial count.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , June 1961 , pp. 177 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Analytical Methods Committee (1959). Analyst, 84, 356.Google Scholar
Cousins, C. M., Hoy, W. A. & Clegg, L. F. L. (1960). J. appl. Bact. 23, 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
F.A.O. (1957). Report on the meeting of experts on the use of hydrogen peroxide and other preservatives in milk. FAO/57/11/8655. Interlaken, September.Google Scholar
Ford, J. E. (1960). Brit. J. Nutr. 14, 485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, M. E., Ford, J. E. & Kon, S. K. (1958). J. Dairy Res. 25, 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, K. M. & Kon, S. K. (1956). Brit. J. Nutr. 10, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, K. M., Kon, S. K., Lea, C. H. & White, J. C. D. (1947–1948). J. Dairy Res. 15, 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, K. M., Kon, S. K. & Watson, M. B. (1937). Milk and Nutrition Part I, p. 37. Reading: National Institute for Research in Dairying.Google Scholar
Kon, S. K. & Thompson, S. Y. (1957). Milchwissenschaft, 12, 166.Google Scholar
Lück, H. (1956). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 18, 363.Google Scholar
Lück, H. & Schillinger, A. (1958). Z. LebensmittUntersuch. 107, 512; 108, 341.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. (1923–1924). J. biol. Chem. 58, 873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. & Carman, G. G. (1926). J. biol. Chem. 68, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nambudripad, V. K. N., Laxminarayana, H. & Iya, K. K. (1952). Indian J. Dairy Sci. 5, 135.Google Scholar
Rosell, J. M., Dagá, C. & Fernandez, J. (1959). Proc. XVth Int. Dairy Congr. 1, 418.Google Scholar
Roundy, Z. D. (1958). J. Dairy Sci. 41, 1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarett, H. P. & Cheldelin, V. H. (1944). J. biol. Chem. 155, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teply, L. J., Derse, P. H. & Price, W. V. (1958). J. Dairy Sci. 41, 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar