Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:34:25.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of fatty acids on the metabolism of pyruvate in lactic acid streptococci

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

R. F. Anders  and
G. R. Jago
R. F. Anders
Affiliation:
Russell Grimwade School of Biochemistry, University of Melbourne and Division of Dairy Research, C.S.I.R.O., Melbourne, Australia
G. R. Jago
Affiliation:
Russell Grimwade School of Biochemistry, University of Melbourne and Division of Dairy Research, C.S.I.R.O., Melbourne, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The metabolism, of pyruvate by resting whole-cell suspensions of Group N streptococci was studied over the pH range 4·0–7·0, in the presence and absence of oleic acid. In the absence of oleic acid pyruvate was utilized maximally at pH 4·5 with the formation of acetate (volatile acid), acetoin + diacetyl and carbon dioxide. The formation of acetate took precedence over the formation of acetoin + diacetyl. In the presenoe of oleic acid the utilization of pyruvate was maximal at pH 6·5 and completely inhibited at pH 4·5. The only products detected at pH 6·5 were acetoin + diacetyl and carbon dioxide. This effect of oleic acid on the metabolism of pyruvate was also obtained after treating the cells with acetone. The mechanism of action of oleic acid on cells of Group N streptococci and its possible influence on the formation of flavour compounds in cultured dairy products is discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , October 1970 , pp. 445 - 456
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anders, R. F. & Jago, G. R. (1964 a). J. Dairy Res. 31, 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anders, R. F. & Jago, G. R. (1964 b). J. Dairy Res. 31, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. F., Northcote, D. H. & Peters, R. (1962). Nature, Lond. 195, 661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, R. S. & Lichstein, H. C. (1963). Archs Biochem. Biophys. 103, 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalgarno, L. & Birt, L. M. (1963). Biochem. J. 87, 586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, D. J. & Feagan, J. I. (1957). J. Dairy Res. 24, 210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedemann, T. E. & Haugen, G. E. (1943). J. biol. Chem. 147, 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunsalus, I. C. (1955). Meth. Enzym. 1, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunsalus, I. C. (1958). 4th Int. Congr. Biochem., Vienna 13, 444.Google Scholar
Hager, L. P. & Lipmann, F. (1955). Meth. Enzym. I, 482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hullin, R. P. & Noble, R. L. (1953). Biochem. J. 55, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jago, G. R. (1957). Ph.D. Thesis: University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Nieman, C. (1954). Bact. Rev. 18, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, K. D. (1961). J. Dairy Res. 28, 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, L. J., DeBusk, B. G., Johnston, P. M. & Getzendaner, M. E. (1951). J. biol. Chem. 192, 851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, B. & Oram, J. D. (1962). J. Dairy Res. 29, 63.Google Scholar
Speckman, R. A. & Collins, E. B. (1968). J. Bact. 95, 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westerfeld, W. W. (1945). J. biol. Chem. 161, 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar