Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:35:57.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of drought condition on the quality of camel milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Reuven Yagil  and
Zipora Etzion
Reuven Yagil
Affiliation:
Unit of Comparative Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
Zipora Etzion
Affiliation:
Unit of Comparative Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Ten-day periods of water restriction followed by 2 h ad lib. water caused radical changes in camel milk. The changes were different from those reported in other mammals. At the end of each dehydration period there were increased water percentages in the milk when compared with milk of hydrated camels. The content of fat, lactose and protein declined. Concentrations of Na, K, phosphate and chloride in milk increased while Ca and Mg concentration declined. The urea concentration of the milk was unchanged. The young suckling calves showed no signs of stress during the dehydration periods. It was concluded that the milk of dehydrated camels is an excellent human food in arid areas, as the water and salt content are high while the nutritive value remains good.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , June 1980 , pp. 159 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aggarwala, A. C. & Sharma, R. M. (1961). A Laboratory Manual of Milk Inspection, 4th edn. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar
Aschaffenburg, R. & Rowland, S. J. (1950). Chemistry and Industry, 636–637.Google Scholar
Bianca, W. (1965). Journal of Dairy Research 32, 291–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleet, I. R., Linzell, J. L. & Peaker, M. (1972). British Veterinary Journal 128, 297–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, N. L. (1977). In Duke's Physiology of domestic animals, 9th edn, pp. 842–859. (Ed. Swenson, M. J..) Ithaca, N.Y.: Comstock Publishing Associates.Google Scholar
Kheraskov, S. G. (1955). Sbornik Dokladov Vsesoyuznogo Soveshchaniya Molochnoe Delu, 174–176.Google Scholar
Kheraskov, S. G. (1961). Voprosy Pitaniya 20 (5), 69–72.Google Scholar
Knoess, K. H. (1977). World Animal Review (22), 39–44.Google Scholar
Konar, A., & Thomas, P. C. (1970). British Veterinary Journal 126, xxv–xxviii.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, F. V. (1965). In Studies on physiology presented to John C. Eccles, pp. 191–199. (Eds Curtis, D. R. and Mclntyre, A. K..) Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, W. V., Morris, R. J. H. & Howard, B. (1963). Nature 197, 270–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloiy, G. M. O. (1972). In Comparative physiology of desert animals, pp. 243–259. (Ed. Maloiy, G. M. O.) London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. & Wheelock, J. V. (1967). Journal of Dairy Research 34, 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Nielsen, B., Schmidt-Nielsen, K., Houpt, T. R. & Jarnum, S. A. (1956). American Journal of Physiology 185, 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Nielsen, B., Schmidt-Nielsen, K., Houpt, T. R. & Jarnum, S. A. (1957). American Journal of Physiology 188, 477–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1964). Desert animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1975). Animal physiology: adaptation and environment. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Nielsen, K., Crawford, E. C. Jr, Newsome, A. E., Rawson, K. S. & Hammel, H. T. (1967). American Journal of Physiology 212, 341–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siebert, B. D. & Macfarlane, W. V. (1971). Physiological Zoology 44, 225–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. R. (1959). Physiology of lactation, 5th edn. Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Sweet, L. E. (1965). In Man, culture and animals, pp. 129–152. (Eds. Leeds, A. and Vayda, A. P..) Washington, D.C: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
Szekely, E. (1978). Szechrome reagents for rapid determination of inorganic and organic compounds in compost fertilizers. Information Report, Applied Research Institute, Ben Ourion University of the Negev, Israel.Google Scholar
Yagil, R. & Berlyne, G. M. (1978). Renal Physiology 1, 104–112.Google Scholar
Yagil, R. & Etzion, Z. (1979). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A 63, 275–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yagil, R., Etzion, Z. & Ganani, J. (1978). Journal of Applied Physiology 45, 540–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yagil, R., Sod-Moriah, U. A. & Meyerstein, N. (1976). Israel Journal of Medical Science 12, 878–880.Google Scholar