Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:08:05.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of amount and composition of feed given over three lactations on the performance of the dairy cow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

William H. Broster
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying†, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, UK
A. June Clements
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying†, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, UK
Valerie J. Broster
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying†, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, UK
Tim Smith
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying†, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, UK
Jonathan W. Siviter
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying†, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, UK
Randolph E. Hill
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying†, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT, UK

Summary

Eighty-nine autumn-calving first calf and adult Friesian cows participated in an experiment on the effect of feeding over three lactations on milk production and live weight change. Fixed daily allowances of digestible energy (DE) formed two of the treatments (high, H; moderate, M). Diets of similar composition were used for both treatments and rations were weighed daily for each cow. The cows within these treatments were re-randomized to H or M at second and again at third parturition on experiment. A further treatment (ALF), applied continuously over three lactations, consisted of the M allowance of compound feed, weighed daily for each cow, plus ad lib. weighed, group-fed forages. The ALF animals were randomized for each lactation into two groups both of which received the same total compound feed allowance over the first 26 weeks of lactation. For one group (Flat) equal amounts were given daily whilst for the other group (Step) the daily amount was decreased monthly. After week 26 equal rations were fed. Hay, maize silage and grass silage formed the forages in winter. Grass, cut for the H and M groups but grazed for the ALF group, provided the summer forage. Energy intakes covered some 80–110% of requirements (Alderman et al. 1975)

Yields of milk and of milk solids responded similarly for both parities. In the first experimental lactation, treatment H led to greater yields compared with M. H also led to smaller losses of live weight in early lactation, equal gains in mid lactation, and smaller gains in late lactation and the dry period, compared with M. Extension of H into a second lactation increased the advantage in milk and solids yields observed in the first lactation on experiment. Recovery of body reserves on treatment M continued. Treatment H in a second lactation on experiment after M in the first lactation led to even greater compensatory gains in live weight at the expense of milk production. There was no effect in the third lactation on experiment of treatments applied in the first lactation. Treatments H and M applied factorially over lactations 2 and 3 gave the same pattern of treatment effects as in lactations 1 and 2. Treatment ALF broadly supported the same milk yield and live weight change as treatment H but improved fat, protein and lactose yields. Within treatment ALF, Flat and Step distribution of compound led to equal performance. Multiple lactation effects of ALF equalled those of H. The effects on milk composition of H compared with M treatment were variable. In general an advantage accrued to ALF over M but without long term effects.

The effect of variation in intake on performance of the dairy cow has been extensively documented for short periods within lactations (Broster, 1972), and more so for milk production than live weight change. However, the evidence on the size and development of effects of variation in feeding over protracted periods within the adult life span of the dairy cow, e.g. some four lactations in the UK, is extremely limited (Broster & Broster, 1984; Broster et al. 1984), both for plane of nutrition and for diet composition. The problem has added point with the introduction of simplified feeding systems which lead to the provision of less attention to the individual cow than hitherto (Johnson, 1982; Leaver, 1986). This dearth of information on the long term feeding of the adult contrasts with the widely gathered evidence on the effect of feeding during rearing on the performance of the mature cow, which is also an important long term relationship. More multi-lactation research is needed and in the present trial, with both young and adult lactating cows, the effects of amount and composition of feed allowance over three lactations were studied.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alderman, G., Harvard, A., Todd, J. R., Edwards, R. A. & Morgan, D. E. 1975 Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. London: HMSO (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food, Technical Bulletin no. 33)Google Scholar
Arriaga-Jordan, C. M. & Holmes, W. 1986 The effect of cereal concentrate supplementation on the digestibility of herbage-based diets for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Science 106 581592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bines, J. A., Broster, W. H., Sutton, J. D., Broster, V. J., Napper, D. J., Smith, T. & Siviter, J. W. 1988 Effect of amount consumed and diet composition on the apparent digestibility of feed in cattle and sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science 110 249259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. 1950 Energy feeding standards for dairy cattle. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 20 121Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. 1972 Effect on milk yield of the cow of the level of feeding during lactation. Dairy Science Abstracts 34 265288Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. & Broster, V. J. 1984 Reviews of the progress of Dairy Science: Long term effects of plane of nutrition on the performance of the dairy cow. Journal of Dairy Research 51 149196CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broster, W. H., Clements, A. J. & Broster, V. J. 1984 Multiple lactation feeding of the dairy cow. World Review of Animal Production 20 6169Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Sutton, J. D., Bines, J. A., Broster, V. J., Smith, T., Siviter, J. W., Johnson, V. W., Napper, D. J. & Schuller, E. 1985 The influence of plane of nutrition and diet composition on the performance of dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Science 104 535557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, A. W. A. 1957 The influence of level of feeding during lactation upon the yield and composition of milk. Dairy Science Abstracts 19 435454Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M. 1986 Voluntary intake. In Principles and Practice of Feeding Dairy Cows pp. 1124 (Eds Broster, W. H., Phipps, R. H. and Johnson, C. L.). Shinfield: National Institute for Research in Dairying (NIRD Technical Bulletin no. 8)Google Scholar
Garnsworthy, P. C. 1988 The effect of energy reserves at calving on performance of dairy cows. In Nutrition and Lactation in the Dairy Cow pp. 157170 (Ed. Garnsworthy, P. C.). London: ButterworthsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, E., Klein, J. W., Rauchenstein, E., Woodward, T. E. & Smith, R. H. 1942 Input-output relationships in milk production. United States Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin no. 815Google Scholar
Johnson, C. L. 1982 Feeding dairy cows – a challenging scene. Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England 143 3445Google Scholar
Korver, S. 1982 Feed intake and production in dairy breeds dependent on the ration. Doctoral thesis: Agricultural University, Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Leaver, J. D. 1986 Systems of concentrate distribution. In Principles and Practice of Feeding Dairy Cows pp. 113131 (Eds Broster, W. H., Phipps, R. H. and Johnson, C. L.) Shinfield: National Institute for Research in Dairying (NIRD Technical Bulletin no. 8)Google Scholar
Poole, D. A. 1987 Flat v. step feeding of medium or high levels of concentrates for dairy cows. Animal Production 45 335344Google Scholar
Smith, T. 1979 The collection of faeces and urine from steers. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 30 215217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. 1967 Statistical Methods 6th ednIowa: Iowa State University PressGoogle Scholar
Strickland, M. J. & Broster, W. H. 1981 The effect of different levels of nutrition at two stages of the lactation on milk production and live-weight change in Friesian cows and heifers. Journal of Agricultural Science 96 677690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Broster, W. H., Schuller, E., Napper, D. J., Broster, Valerie J. & Bines, J. A. 1988 (W. H. Broster, R. H. Phipps and C. L.Johnson) Shinfield: National Institute for Research in Dairying (NIRD Technical Bulletin no. 8)Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Broster, W. H., Schuller, E., Napper, D. J., Broster, Valerie J. & Bines, J. A. 1988 Influence of plane of nutrition and diet composition on rumen fermentation and energy utilization by dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Science 110 261270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiktorsson, H. 1971 Studies on the effects of different levels of nutrition to dairy cows. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Science 1 83103Google Scholar
Wiktorsson, H. 1979 General plane of nutrition for dairy cows. In Feeding Strategy for the. High Yielding Dairy Cow pp. 148170 (Eds Broster, W. H. and Swan, H.). St. Albans: Granada Publishing Ltd (EAAP Publication no. 25)Google Scholar