Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:29:49.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of ageing cooled milk on the composition of the fat globule membrane

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

M. Anderson ,
G. C. Cheeseman ,
Dorothy J. Knight  and
W. F. Shipe
M. Anderson
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
G. C. Cheeseman
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
Dorothy J. Knight
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
W. F. Shipe
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effect of ageing fresh milk for 24 h at 4°C on the composition of 4 fractions of milk fat globule membrane (FGM) – microsomal pellet membrane (MPM), deoxycholate soluble membrane (DOCM), high density membrane (HDM) and low density membrane (LDM) – prepared from washed cream treated with sodium deoxycholate (DOC), was studied for milk of individual cows. Total FGM and its fractions were solubilized by treatment with sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), EDTA and β-mercaptoethanol, and the dissociated FGM proteins were separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the presence of SDS.

Ageing resulted in a greater loss of phospholipid during cream preparation than was found with fresh milk, and also in a reduction in the total amount of FGM isolated. Loss of FGM material was confined to MPM, DOCM and LDM and was accompanied by compositional changes in DOCM and LDM, quantitatively the most significant fractions. Ageing also produced changes in the gel electrophoresis patterns of DOCM, where the band of greatest mobility (mol. wt about 16000) was partially lost, and of LDM, where there was an increase observed in the major protein band.

The implication of the results on the proposed models of FGM structure is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , February 1972 , pp. 95 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, M. & Cheeseman, G. C. (1971). J. Dairy Res. 38, 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, J. R. (1962). J. Dairy Sci. 45, 943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, J. R. (1965). In Fundamentals of Dairy Chemistry, p. 447. (Eds Webb, B. H. and Johnson, A. H..) Westport, Conn.: Avi Publ. Co.Google Scholar
Brunner, J. R. (1969 a). In Structural and Functional Aspects of Lipoproteins in Living Systems, p. 549. (Eds Tria, E. and Scanu, A. M..) New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Brunner, J. R. (1969 b). In Structural and Functional Aspects of Lipoproteins in Living Systems, p. 554. (Eds Tria, E. and Scanu, A. M..) New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Chen, P. S. Jr, Toribara, T. Y. & Warner, H. (1956). Analyt. Chem. 28, 1756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chien, H. C. & Richardson, T. (1967). J. Dairy Sci. 50, 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copius Peereboom, J. W. (1969). Fette Seifen Anstr Mittel 71, 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J., Mathieson, J. & Boyne, A. W. (1970). Analyst, Lond. 95, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenbank, G. R. & Pallansch, M. J. (1961). J. Dairy Sci. 44, 1597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwalkar, V. R. & Brunner, J. R. (1965). J. Dairy Sci. 48, 1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, S. & Smith, L. M. (1965). Biochemistry, Easton 4, 2550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, R. H. & Brunner, J. R. (1960). J. Dairy Sci. 43, 912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koops, J. & Tarassuk, N. P. (1959). Neth. Milk Dairy J. 13, 180.Google Scholar
Lenard, J. (1970). Biochemistry, Easton 9, 1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mabbitt, L. A. & Cheeseman, G. C. (1967). J. Dairy Res. 34, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClare, C. W. F. (1967). Nature, Lond. 216, 766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, R. K. (1954). Biochem. J. 57, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prentice, J. H. (1969). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 31, 353.Google Scholar
Swope, F. C. & Brunner, J. R. (1968). Milchwissenschaft 23, 470.Google Scholar
Tarassuk, N. P. & Frankel, E. N. (1957). J. Dairy Sci. 40, 418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M. P., Brunner, J. R., Stine, C. M. & Lindquist, K. (1961). J. Dairy Sci. 44, 1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacharius, R. M., Zell, T. E., Morrison, J. H. & Woodlock, J. J. (1969). Analyt. Biochem. 30, 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar