Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:44:21.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differential titration of plasmin and plasminogen in milk using sandwich ELISA with monoclonal antibodies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1997

DIDIER DUPONT
Affiliation:
INRA, Station de Recherches en Technologie et Analyses Laitières, BP89, F-39801 Poligny Cedex, France
CHRISTELLE BAILLY
Affiliation:
INRA, Station de Recherches en Technologie et Analyses Laitières, BP89, F-39801 Poligny Cedex, France
JEANNE GROSCLAUDE
Affiliation:
INRA, Station de Virologie et Immunologie Moléculaires, F-78352 Jouy-en-Josas Cedex, France
JEAN-CLAUDE COLLIN
Affiliation:
INRA, Station de Recherches en Technologie et Analyses Laitières, BP89, F-39801 Poligny Cedex, France

Abstract

Two sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) have been developed for quantitation of bovine milk plasminogen and plasmin. The assays used two monoclonal antibodies, one specific for plasminogen and the other specific for plasminogen plus plasmin. Plasmin concentration was obtained by subtracting the first concentration from the second. The assays were sensitive (linear range, 5–75 ng/ml), repeatable (CV, 8 and 5% for plasmin and plasminogen titration respectively), specific (no cross reactivity with the major milk proteins) and directly applicable to skimmed milk with no particular pretreatment of the sample. However, ELISA did not permit complete titration of milk plasminogen and plasmin (only 60–90% could be quantified). This lack of accuracy was due to casein interfering with the plasmin–plasminogen titration by ELISA. Results obtained with ELISA or an enzymic technique on 20 milk samples collected from individual cows milked throughout pregnancy showed that the ELISA was particularly suitable for analysis of late lactation or mastitic milk where proteinase inhibitors interfered with enzymic quantitation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)