Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:03:55.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Destruction of Bacillus subtilis spores with solutions of sodium hydroxide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

R. L. Whitehouse
Affiliation:
Department of Dairy Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
L. F. L. Clegg
Affiliation:
Department of Dairy Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Summary

The rate of destruction of Bacillus subtilis spores by sodium hydroxide solutions in the range of atmospheric temperatures 34—82 °F was studied: (a) to provide information which might be used in practice for immersion cleaning of dairy utensils in sodium hydroxide solutions at low atmospheric temperatures, and (b) to examine the nature of the disinfection curves by slowing down the rate of disinfection. The results expressed as a three-dimensional graph showed that an increase in temperature from 34 to 82 °F had a more marked effect on spore destruction than an increase in concentration of sodium hydroxide from 1·5 to 5·0%. The overall effect could be expressed as

where t = time in hours for the 99% destruction of B. subtilis spores, C = concentration of NaOH (%, w/v) and θ = temperature, °F. Since the time for the 99% destruction of B. subtilis spores by a 2% NaOH solution at 34 °F is 5 times that of a 5% solution, immersion cleaning in cold climates might be assisted by increasing the concentration of NaOH from the normal 2–3 to 5%. Results in disinfection tests at low temperatures were more variable than had been observed in previous work at higher temperatures. These surprising results prevented a careful study of the nature of the disinfection curves and confirmed previous conclusions that such curves are basically sigmoid.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Charney, J., Fisher, W. P. & Hegarty, C. F. (1951). J. Bact. 62, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, L. F. L. (1956). J. Soc. Dairy Tech. 9, 95.Google Scholar
Franklin, J. G. & Clegg, L. F. L. (1956). Dairy Ind. 21, 454.Google Scholar
Grinsted, E. & Clegg, L. F. L. (1955). J. Dairy Res. 22, 178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hachisuka, Y., Kato, N., Asano, N. & Kuno, T. (1955). J. Bact. 69, 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, R. C. & Jacobs, S. E. (1945). J. Hyg., Camb., 44, 120.Google Scholar
Thiel, C. C, Clough, P. A. & Clegg, L. F. L. (1955). J. Dairy Res. 22, 156.Google Scholar
Williams, D. J., Clegg, L. F. L. & Wolf, J. (1957). J. appl. Bact. 20, 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withell, E. R. (1942). J. Hyg., Camb., 42, 125.Google Scholar