Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:41:00.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bovine milk acid phosphatase: II. Binding to casein substrates and heat-inactivation studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. T. Andrews
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT

Summary

The acid phosphatase of bovine milk was further purified to yield enzyme with an activity of about 2 units/mg. This was almost 105 times the activity present in milk and enabled a detailed study of heat inactivation to be made, together with further measurements on binding to casein substrates.

The effectiveness of caseins as inhibitors of the hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl phosphate by acid phosphatase paralleled the phosphate content of the casein molecules, so that αs1-casein A was a more potent inhibitor with a K1 of 1·7 mM than β-casein A1A2 (K1 = 4·3 mM), which in turn was more inhibitory than κ-casein A (K1 = 5·9 mM).

The heat inactivation of acid phosphatase followed first-order kinetics at pH 4·9, 5·2 and 6·7 and values of E, the activation energy, were between 2·4×105 and 3·0×105 J mole −1 in all cases, consistent with simple protein denaturation. The presence of 1% αs1-casein A, 1% β-casein A1A2, 1% κ-casein A, 1% isoelectrically precipitated ‘whole’ casein and 1% fresh raw milk provided no substrate protection at pH 5·2 or 6·7. Acid phosphatase was somewhat less heat stable at pH 6·7 than at pH 4·9, but may be expected to survive typical milk pasteurization conditions almost completely. However, conventional milk sterilization or ultra-high-temperature (UHT) processes would be expected to give total inactivation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, A. T. & Cheeseman, G. C. (1971). Journal of Dairy Research 38, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, A. T. & Pallavicini, C. (1973). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 321, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, E. W., Farrell, H. M. Jr & Carroll, R. J. (1972). Biochemistry 11, 2450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, E. W., Jasewicz, L. & Zittle, C. A. (1961). Journal of Dairy Science 44, 1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, E. W. & Zittle, C. A. (1963). Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 101, 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, I. R. & Perkins, D. J. (1971). Biochemical Journal 124, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, M. & Webb, E. C. (1964). Enzymes, 2nd edn, pp. 315359. London: Longmans Green.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. L. J. (1972). Journal of Dairy Research 39, 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercier, J.-C., Brignon, G. & Ribadeau-Dumas, B. (1973). European Journal of Biochemistry 35, 222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercier, J.-C., Grosclaude, F. & Ribadeau-Dumas, B. (1971). European Journal of Biochemistry 23, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullen, J. E. C. (1950). Journal of Dairy Research 17, 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepper, L. & Thompson, M. P. (1963). Journal of Dairy Science 46, 764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribadeau-Dumas, B., Brignon, G., Grosclaude, F. & Mercier, J.-C. (1972). European Journal of Biochemistry 25, 505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. (1969). Dairy Science Abstracts 31, 171.Google Scholar
Waugh, D. F. (1971). In Milk proteins: Chemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 2, pp. 385. (Ed. McKenzie, H. A..) New York: Academic Press Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar