Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:32:47.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biuret and urea in concentrates for milking cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

R. Waite
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr, Scotland
M. E. Castle
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr, Scotland
J. N. Watson
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr, Scotland
A. D. Drysdale
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr, Scotland

Summary

Two experiments, one with 18 and one with 21 cows, were made to compare the feeding value for milk production of concentrates in which the nitrogen normally supplied by oil cake was completely replaced by either biuret or urea. In expt 1 the urea and biuret contributed 52% of the total nitrogen in the concentrate and in expt 2 they contributed 43%. Hay was fed as the sole roughage. The estimated energy intake in expt 1 was 102–104% of the Woodman standard and in expt 2 it was 108–109%.

In both experiments milk production was about 10% less on the urea and biuret treatments than on the control treatment. There was no significant difference in milk yield between the biuret and the urea treatments. The percentages of fat and protein in the milk from the urea and biuret treatments were higher than from the control treatment, but the weights of these milk constituents were slightly lower than from the control treatment. Liveweight changes and water consumption were not affected by the experimental treatments. In expt 2 an intake of nitrogen about 20% lower than is often recommended in the United Kingdom did not appear to depress milk yields. Three cows that had received biuret concentrates in expt 2 continued to do so during a nitrogen balance trial lasting 3 weeks. Each cow was slightly in negative balance, the average value being −4gN per cow per day.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2. Ruminants. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Alderman, G., Collins, F. C, Jones, D. J. C, Morgan, D. E. & Ibbotson, C. F. (1967). N.A.A.S., Coley Park, Reading.Google Scholar
ArmstrongD, G. D, G. & Trinder, N. (1966). J. Univ. Newcastle upon Tyne agric. Soc. 20, 3.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C, Bartlett, S. & Johnson, V. W. (1951). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 41, 98.Google Scholar
Blackburn, P. S., Laing, C. M. & Malcolm, D. F. (1955). J. Dairy Res. 22, 37.Google Scholar
Evans, R. E. (1960). Bull. Minist. Agric. Fish. Fd, Lond. no. 48.Google Scholar
Gaines, W. L. (1928). Bull. III. agric. Exp. Stn no. 308.Google Scholar
Hatfield, E. E., Garrigus, U. S., Forbes, R. M., Neumann, A. L. & Gaither, W. (1959). J. Anim. Sci. 18, 1208.Google Scholar
Lucas, H. L. (1943). J. Dairy Sci. 26, 1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mclaren, G. A., Anderson, G. C, Tsai, L. I. & Barth, K. M. (1965). J. Nutr. 87, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oltjen, R. R. & Putnam, P. A. (1966). J. Nutr. 89, 385.Google Scholar
Owen, E. C, Smith, J. A. B. & Wright, N. C. (1943). Biochem. J. 37, 44.Google Scholar
Peters, J. P. & Van slyke, D. D. (1932). Quantitative Clinical Chemistry. London: Baillière, Tindall and Cox.Google Scholar
Reid, J. T. (1953). J. Dairy Sci. 36, 955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, S. J. (1946). Dairy Inds 11, 656.Google Scholar
Schaadt, H. Jr., Johnson, R. R. & Mcclure, K. E. (1966). J. Anim. Sci. 25, 73.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods, 5th edn. Ames: Iowa State University Pres.Google Scholar
Ulbrich, M., Wallmen, A. & Mielke, H. (1966). Arch. Tierernähr. 16, 315.Google Scholar
Virtanen, A. I. (1966). Science, N.Y. 153, 1603.Google Scholar
Waite, R., White, J. C. D. & Robertson, A. (1956). J. Dairy Res. 23, 65.Google Scholar
Waite, R. & Wilson, , Agnes, G. (1968). J. Dairy Res. 35, 203.Google Scholar
Wright, N. C. (1939). J. Minist. Agric, Lond. 46, 251.Google Scholar