Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T01:04:07.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Apparatus and milking techniques used in lactation studies with sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

T. T. Treacher
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire

Summary

A description is given of a simple milking apparatus for collecting the yields of individual ewes, and of the milking procedure used in studies of lactation in ewes of ‘mutton’ breeds. The incidence of mastitis, level of milk yield, some of the non-nutritional factors affecting the milk yield and the coefficients of variation of milk yield and composition are discussed in relation to data from 6 experiments in which ewes of mutton breeds were machine-milked twice daily for 6–9 weeks of lactation.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ashton, W. M., Owen, J. B. & Ingleton, J. W. (1964). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 63, 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnicoat, C. R., Murray, P. F., Roberts, E. M. & Wilson, G. S. (1957). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 48, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosc, J. (1962). Cah. Ingrs agron. 164, 29.Google Scholar
Bosc, J. (1966). Annls Nutr. Aliment. 20, 193.Google Scholar
Bosc, J., Flamant, J.-C. & Ricordeau, G. (1967). Annls Zootech. 16, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyazoglu, J. G. (1963). Annls Zootech. 12, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, W. H., Broster, V. J. & Smith, T. (1969). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 72, 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, W. H. & Tuck, V. (1967). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 69, 465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimov, S., Goranov, I., Garanicheva, K. & Dobrev, D. (1965). Ikonomika i Mekhanizatsiya na Selskoto Stopanstvo 2, 423.Google Scholar
Dimov, S., Taner, I. & Shalichev, Y. (1966). Mekhaniz. électrif. Sel. Stop. 16, 22.Google Scholar
Gaal, M. (1957). Allattenyésztés 6, 61.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. W. & Hogue, D. E. (1964). J. Anim. Sci. 23, 935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, N. McC. (1964). Aust. J. agric. Res. 15, 127.Google Scholar
Lucas, H. L. (1960). J. Dairy Sci. 43, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCance, I. (1959). Aust. J. agric. Res. 10, 839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morag, M. B. (1969). Annls Zootech. 17, 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morag, M. B., Gibb, J. A. C. & Fox, S. (1967). J. Dairy Res. 34, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
N.I.R.D. (1963). Rep. natn. Inst. Res. Dairy., 1962, p. 79.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B. & Ingleton, J. W. (1963). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 61, 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plommet, M. & Ricordeau, G. (1960). Annls Zootech. 9, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricordeau, G. & Denamur, R. (1962). Annls Zootech, 11, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricordeau, G. & Labussière, J. (1968). Annls Zootech. 17, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricordeau, G., Martinet, J. & Denamur, R. (1963). Annls Zootech. 12, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semjan, S. (1961). Polnohospodárstvo 8, 131.Google Scholar
Spedding, C. R. W. (1962). Br. vet. J. 118, 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiel, C. C., Claesson, C. O. & Rabold, K. (1969). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 31, 49.Google Scholar
Treacher, T. T. (1967). Ph.D. Thesis University of Reading.Google Scholar
Treacher, T. T. (1970). Anim. Prod. 12, 23.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1948). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 38, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar