Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:25:40.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

698. Effect of the heat treatment of milk on the yield, quality and certain properties of standardized separated milk cheese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

G. M. El Sadek
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Kobbah Palace, Cairo, Egypt
L. Abd El Motteleb
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Kobbah Palace, Cairo, Egypt

Extract

1. Four batches of soft cheese were made using rennet coagulation from both raw and pasteurized separated milk standardized to contain 1·5% fat and 7% added sodium chloride.

2. The yield of pasteurized milk cheese was about 3·33% higher than that of raw milk cheese.

3. Pasteurization of the milk improved the flavour and the texture of the fresh cheese, but had no marked effects on the body and general appearance.

4. The shelf keeping property after 4–5 days under the conditions of these experiments was better for the cheese made from raw milk. Reasons for this apparent anomaly are discussed.

5. Chemical analyses showed a greater moisture retention by the pasteurized milk cheese, leading to a lower content of fat and total nitrogen but increased sodium chloride in solution. Some retention of heat coagulable protein in the pasteurized milk cheese was suggested by a higher total nitrogen in dry-matter figure and by a lower nitrogen content of the pasteurized milk whey.

6. Pasteurization of the milk greatly reduced the total bacterial population of the fresh cheese and also the acidity of the whey produced.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Rowland, S. J. (1938). J. Dairy Res. 9, 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)British Standards Institution (1935), no. 770.Google Scholar
(3)Davies, W. L. (1952). Analyst, 57, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Chalmers, C. H. (1948). Bacteria in Relation to the Milk Supply, pp. 233–7. London: Edward Arnold and Co.Google Scholar
(5)Davis, J. G. (1940). Dairy Ind. 5, 157, 212.Google Scholar
(6)Rogers, L. A. (Associates of) (1935). Fundamentals of Dairy Science, p. 244. New York, U.S.A.: Reinhold Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
(7)Tretsven, W. I. (1949). Proc. XIIth Int. Dairy Congr. 3, 438.Google Scholar