Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:23:21.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

663. The relationship between milk secretion and the rate of milking by machine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

P. A. Clough
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
F. H. Dodd
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading

Extract

Lactation has two phases: the continuous process of secretion and the mechanism of ejection which occurs only during milking. Because ejection is a transitory phase it is to be expected that within certain limits milk yield will be inversely related to the duration of milking, which was, in fact, demonstrated many years ago with hand-milked cows(1). With machine milking the situation is different because the forces which the machine applies to the udders of all cows within a herd are the same, and thus the differences in milking rate that occur are due to differences between the cows. Under these conditions, if milking rate can be shown to affect milk yield it is a demonstration of how the physiological factors controlling milking rate can modify the expression of the inheritance of milk secretion.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Babcock, S. M. (1889). Rep. Wis. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 6, p. 42.Google Scholar
(2)Dodd, F. H. & Foot, A. S. (1953). J. Dairy Res. 20, 138.Google Scholar
(3)British Oil and Cake Mills Ltd. (1955). Final Report 1st Bull Progeny Test (Yorks), 1953–54.Google Scholar
(4)Dodd, F. H. (1953). J. Dairy Res. 20, 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Baxter, E. S., Clarke, P. M., Dodd, F. H. & Foot, A. S. (1950). J. Dairy Res. 17, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Brumby, P. (1956). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 16, 89.Google Scholar