Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T05:47:13.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

556. The use of seaweed meals in concentrate mixtures for dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. W. A. Burt ,
S. Bartlett  and
S. J. Rowland
A. W. A. Burt
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
S. Bartlett
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
S. J. Rowland
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The relative effects upon milk yield and composition of three concentrate mixtures containing 10% of two types of seaweed meal (Ascophyllum nodosum and Laminaria cloustoni) and an oatfeed-salt mixture, have been observed.

Each cow received daily a basal ration of 30 lb. marrowstem kale and 18 lb. hay for maintenance and the first 1½ gal. of milk and 31½ lb. concentrates for each gallon thereafter.

No significant effects of treatment upon milk yield or fat percentage were observed.

The milk produced on the oatfeed-salt mixture had a slightly but significantly higher solids-not-fat content than that on the mixtures containing seaweed meals.

The results showed that seaweed meals have a nutritive value no greater than that of a mixture of 7 parts oatfeed and 1 part salt, which had an estimated starch equivalent of only 39.

In view of the relatively high cost, low palatability and low nutritive value of seaweed meals, their possible use in the feeding of dairy cows appears very limited.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , October 1954 , pp. 299 - 304
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Woodward, N. (1951). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 2, 477.Google Scholar
(2)Black, W. A. P. (1953). J. Minist. Agric. 60, 126.Google Scholar
(3)Senior, B. J., Collins, P. & Kelly, M.(1946). Econ. Proc. R. Dublin Soc. 3, 273.Google Scholar
(4)Dunlop, G. (1953). Nature, Lond., 171, 439.Google Scholar
(5)Dunlop, G. (1952). Fmrs' Wkly, 37, 59.Google Scholar
(6)Cochran, W. G., Autrey, K. M. & Cannon, C. Y. (1941). J. Dairy Sci. 24, 937.Google Scholar
(7)Davis, H. P., Morgan, R. F., Brody, S. & Ragsdale, A. C. (1937). Res. Bull. Neb. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 91.Google Scholar
(8)Blaxter, K. L. & French, T. H. (1944). J. agric. Sci. 34, 217.Google Scholar
(9)Woodman, H. E. (1948). Bull. Minist. Agric., Lond., no. 48.Google Scholar
(10)Rowland, S. J. (1951). N.A.A.S. quart. Rev. 14, 47.Google Scholar