Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:11:01.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

476. Observations on the influence of inhibitory substances produced by the lactobacilli of Gruyère cheese on the development of anaerobic spore-formers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. Hirsch
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Mary McClintock
Affiliation:
Station de Recherches Laitières de Poligny, Jura, France
G. Mocquot
Affiliation:
Station de Recherches Laitières de Poligny, Jura, France

Extract

1. The failure of clostridia to produce a butyric acid fermentation, when known to be present in Swiss-type cheese, is discussed.

2. It is suggested that inhibitory substances produced by the predominating lactic flora of young cheese are partly responsible for the suppression of the fermentation.

3. Details are given of the techniques used to investigate this supposition.

4. The evidence was obtained by examining fifty-one samples of Gruyère cheese, 78% of which were contaminated with clostridia. 85% of the samples contained inhibitory lactobacilli.

5. In 30% of the samples the inhibitory phenomena were sufficiently marked to give clear zones of inhibition against Staphylococcus aureus when a suspension of cheese was placed in penicillin cups.

6. Inhibition of Clostridium butyricum was demonstrated with pure cultures of lactobacilli. The cultures could grow at temperatures from 30 to 50° C, but were inhibitory only at certain temperatures of incubation which appear to be a strain characteristic.

7. The inhibitory substance(s) concerned is not nisin because it is acid and heat labile.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Dorner, W. (Kursteiner) (1924). Landw. Jb. Schweiz. p. 175.Google Scholar
(2)Zollikofer, E. & Richard, O. (1942). Schweiz. Milchztg, 68, 363.Google Scholar
(3)Dorner, W. (1942). J. Bact. 43, 46 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
(4)Van Beynum, J. & Pette, J. W. (19351936). Zbl. Bakt. II, 93, 198.Google Scholar
(5)Dorner, W. (1938). Lait, 18, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Richard, O. (1948). Nature, Lond., 162, 463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Rep. Coun. Set. Industr. Res., Aust. 19441945, p. 125.Google Scholar
(8)Hood, E. G. & Bowen, J. F. (1950). Sci. Agric. 30, 38.Google Scholar
(9)Lebert, F. (1948). Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 74, 256.Google Scholar
(10)Weiser, H. H. (1942). J. Bact. 43, 46 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
(11)Albus, W. R. (1928). J. Bact. 15, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Prevot, A. R. (1948). Manuel de classification et de determination des bactéries anaerobies, 2nd ed.Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
(13)Ritter, P. (1951). Schweiz. Milchztg, 77, 527.Google Scholar
(14)Kiuru, V. J. T. (1949). Rep. Proc. 12th Int. Dairy Congr. 2, 509.Google Scholar
(15)Wynne, E. S. & Foster, J. W. (1948). J. Bact. 55, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16)Wynne, E. S. & Foster, J. W. (1948). J. Bact. 55, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17)Wynne, E. S. & Foster, J. W. (1948). J. Bact. 55, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(18)Foster, J. W. & Wynne, E. S. (1948). J. Bact. 55, 623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(19)Guittonneau, G., Keilling, J. & Lancelot, E. (1935). Lait, 15, 201.Google Scholar
(20)Hirsch, A., Grinsted, E., Chapman, H. R. & Mattick, A. T. R. (1951). J. Dairy Res. 18, 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(21)Mattick, A. T. R. & Hirsch, A. (1947). Lancet, 2, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(22)Wheater, D. M., Hirsch, A. & Mattick, A. T. R. (1951). Nature, Lond., 168, 659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(23)Bhat, J. V. & Barker, H. A. (1947). J. Bact. 54, 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(24)Weinzirl, J. (1921). Amer. J. Publ. Hlth, 11, 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(25)Hirsch, A. & Wheater, D. M. (1951). J. Dairy Res. 18, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar