Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:51:03.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

473. The serological classification of Streptococcus cremoris

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

C. A. E. Briggs  and
L. G. M. Newland
C. A. E. Briggs
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
L. G. M. Newland
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Attempts to produce in rabbits group N sera for Streptococcus cremoris, using suspensions of living, disintegrated and heat-treated bacterial cells, yielded only non-specific products, cross-reactions occurring most commonly and intensively with HCl extracts of the streptococci of groups K and L.

2. The non-specific antibodies in these sera were completely removed by absorption with streptococci of group K or L, the group N reactions being only partially impaired.

3. In order to inactivate, before immunizing rabbits, that antigen in the ‘cremoris’ cells responsible for stimulating the production of non-specific antibodies, the organisms were ‘absorbed’ with an excess of group K or L antiserum.

4. With suspensions of organisms treated in this way, potent group N specific precipitating sera were obtained for both freshly isolated and freeze-dried strains of Str. cremoris.

5. The identity of Str. cremoris with serological group N is thus established.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 1952 , pp. 160 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Briggs, C. A. E. (1952). Nature, Lond. 169, 455.Google Scholar
(2)Briggs, C. A. E. (1952). J. Dairy Res. 19, 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Fuller, A. T. (1938). Brit. J. exp. Path. 19, 130.Google Scholar
(4)Hirsch, A. & Grinsted, E. (1951). J. Dairy Res. 18, 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Hunter, G. J. E. (1946). J. Hyg., Camb., 44, 264.Google Scholar
(6)Lancefield, R. (1925). J. exp. Med. 42, 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Lancefield, R. (1933). J. exp. Med. 57, 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Mattick, A. T. R. & Shattock, P. M. F. (1943). Nature, Lond., 151, 278.Google Scholar
(9)Mickle, H. (1948). J. Roy. micr. Soc. 68, 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Nichols, A. A. & Hoyle, M. (1948). J. Dairy Res. 15, 409.Google Scholar
(11)Niven, C. F., Smiley, K. L. & Sherman, J. M. (1942). J. Bact. 43, 651.Google Scholar
(12)Rep. Nat. Inst. Res. Dairy., Reading, 1950, p. 46.Google Scholar
(13)Seelemann, M. (1948). Biologie der bei Tieren und Menschen vorkommenden Streptokokken. Nürenburg: Hans Carl.Google Scholar
(14)Seelemann, M. & Carstens, O. (1951). Milchwissenschaft, 6, 231.Google Scholar
(15)Sharpe, M. E. (1951). Personal communication.Google Scholar
(16)Sharpe, M. E. (1952). In the Press.Google Scholar
(17)Shattock, P. M. F. (1949). J. gen. Microbiol. 3, 80.Google Scholar
(18)Shattock, P. M. F. & Mattick, A. T. R. (1943). J. Hyg., Camb., 43, 173.Google Scholar
(19)Swartling, P. F. 1951). J. Dairy Res. 18, 256.Google Scholar