Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:45:31.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

415. Factors affecting the rate of machine milking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Eleanor S. Baxter ,
Pamela M. Clarke ,
F. H. Dodd  and
A. S. Foot
Eleanor S. Baxter
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Pamela M. Clarke
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
F. H. Dodd
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
A. S. Foot
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. A study was made of the milking of the two hind quarters of four cows by teat cup and by teat cannula at three levels of vacuum and by teat cannula at atmospheric pressure.

2. The eight quarters milked at significantly different maximum rates by teat cup but at nearly the same rate through a teat cannula, suggesting that the teat orifice is a very important factor controlling rate of milking.

3. The maximum rate of milking by both teat cup and teat cannula increased with increasing level of vacuum from 11 to 20 in. Hg. The rate of increase in the teat-cup milking was greater than in the cannula milking, suggesting that the teat orifice was stretched open at the higher levels of vacuum.

4. The average amount of strippings increased at the higher level of vacuum in teat-cup milking, due apparently to teat-cup crawl.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , June 1950 , pp. 117 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Whittleston, W. G. (1946). N.Z. J. Sri. Tech. 28 A, 188.Google Scholar
(2)Dodd, F. H. & Foot, A. S. (1950). Unpublished data.Google Scholar
(3)Smith, V. R. & Petersen, W. E. (1946). J. Dairy Sci. 29, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Whittleston, W. G. & Verrall, S. A. (1947). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 28 A, 406.Google Scholar
(5)Hall, H. S. (1950). J. Dairy Res. (in the Press.)Google Scholar
(6)Petersen, W. E. (1944). J. Dairy Sci. 27, 433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Tgetgel, B. (1926). Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilk. 68, 335.Google Scholar
(8)Dodd, F. H. & Foot, A. S. (1947). J. Dairy Res. 15, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Dodd, F. H. & Foot, A. S. (1949). J. Dairy Res. 16, 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Dodd, F. H., Foot, A. S., Henriques, Ettie & Neave, F. K. (1950). J. Dairy Res. 17, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar