Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:05:31.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

318. The effect of acidity on the production of diacetyl by betacocci in milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

G. A. Cox
G. A. Cox
Affiliation:
Dairy Research Institute (N.Z.), Palmerston North, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The diacetyl production of betacocci isolated from starters, cheese and rye-grass was investigated at pR values ranging from 5.5 to 44. The betacocci produced diacetyl and subsequently partially or wholly destroyed it.

2. There was a considerable variation in the amount of diacetyl produced by the different strains of betacocci. Capacity to produce diacetyl could not be correlated with any other property of the organisms.

3. The rate of growth of the organisms was progressively slower the lower the pH, but at least as much diacetyl was eventually formed at low pK values as at high pH. values. The results showed that there was an alteration in the metabolism of the organisms, the diacetyl-producing power per unit cell increasing with decreasing pH.

4. The results found enable an explanation of the rapid production of diacetyl in mixed starters to be offered.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 14 , Issue 1-2 , March 1945 , pp. 28 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Wiley, Cox, & Whitehead, (1939). J. Coun. sci. industr. Res., Aust., 12, 239.Google Scholar
(2)Michaelian, , Hoecker, & Hammer, (1938). J. Dairy Sci. 21, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Van Beynum, & Pette, (1938). Versl. landb. Onderz. no. 44, C. 207.Google Scholar
(4) Hammer (1920). Res. Bull. la agric. Exp. Sta. no. 63.Google Scholar
(5)Sherwood, (1939). J. Dairy Res. 10, 426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Hammer, & Bailey, (1919). Res. Bull. la agric. Exp. Sta. no. 55.Google Scholar
(7)Pien, , Baisse, & Martin, (1937). Lait, 17, 673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Cox, & Wiley, (1939). J. Coun. sci. industr. Res., Aust., 12, 227.Google Scholar
(9)Wiley, , Cox, & Whitehead, (1939). J. Coun. sci. industr. Res., Aust., 12, 232.Google Scholar
(10)Hücker, & Pederson, (1931). Zbl. Bakt. II, 85, 65.Google Scholar