Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T04:54:43.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

242. A rapid phosphatase test: (a) Adaptation of Scharer's modification to pasteurizing conditions in Great Britain; (b) A study of factors influencing the reliability of the test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

R. Aschaffenburg  and
F. K. Neave
R. Aschaffenburg
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
F. K. Neave
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

By adapting Scharer's “10min. field test” to British conditions of pasteurization, an accurate phosphatase test has been evolved requiring less than 1½ hr. for completion. The method is described in detail.

A small percentage of anomalies was detected when applying the new method to the examination of pasteurized samples bulked from small quantities of milk (less than 100 gallons). This led to a study of several factors thought to be the likely cause of such anomalous results.

No correlation was found between the phosphatase surviving heat treatment and the stage of lactation when milk from individual cows and from small groups of animals was tested, with the possible exception of the early stages of lactation when the enzyme concentration before and after heating was frequently found to be low.

It was observed that pasteurized milk from animals suffering from mastitis tends to give abnormally high results of the phosphatase test. The amount of residual phosphatase is subject to considerable fluctuation.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 1939 , pp. 485 - 497
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Kay, H. D. & Graham, W. R. Jnr. (1935). J. Dairy Res. 6, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Scharer, H. (1938). J. Dairy Sci. 21, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Scharer, H. (1938). J. Milk Tech. 1 (5), 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Jepsen, A. & Madelung, P. (1939). Medlemsbl. danske Dyrlaegeforen. 22, no. 435.Google Scholar
5Scharer, H. (1939). J. Milk Tech. 2(1), 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Roger, D. M. (1939). J. Milk Tech. 2 (1), 21.Google Scholar
7Follby, S. J. & Kay, H. D. (1935). Biochem. J. 29, 1837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Follby, S. J. & Kay, H. D. (1936). Enzymologia, 1, 48.Google Scholar
9Edwards, S. J. (1933). J. comp. Path. 46, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Foot, A. S. & Shattock, P.M.F. (1938). J. Dairy Res. 9, 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Minett, F. C. (1936). J. Hyg., Camb., 35, 504.Google Scholar
12Davis, J. G., Mcclemont, J. & Rogers, H. J. (1939). J. Dairy Res. 10, 60.Google Scholar