Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:44:23.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

181. Induced O/R potentials, rates of growth and the volatile acid production of lactic acid bacteria in milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. G. Davis
J. G. Davis
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The abilities of type cultures of lactic acid bacteria to reduce five O/R indicators in plain milk and yeast dextrose milk have been described and the factors influencing their behaviour in this respect discussed. Methylene blue, litmus and safranine appear to be of some diagnostic value for the differentiation of types. There is a marked correlation between rapidity of growth in milk, ability to reduce O/R dyes and the proportion of by-products. This relationship holds not only for the different groups and types, but also for variations in behaviour observed in species kept under laboratory observation. It is suggested that rate of growth is fundamentally related to the amount of by-products and hence presumably to flavour-producing substances such as diacety and acetic acid. Thus in cheese-ripening enforced slowness of growth may be as important as the presence of specific types.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 1938 , pp. 85 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Davis, (1935). J. Dairy Res. 6, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2) Davis, (1938). J. Dairy Res. (in the Press).Google Scholar
(3) Davis, (1937). J. Path. Bad. 45, 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4) Davis, (1932). J. Dairy Res. 3, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5) Davis, (1932). Unpublished observations.Google Scholar
(6) Sherwood, (1937). J. Dairy Res. 8, 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7) Mattick, & Hiscox, (1938). Nat. Inst. Res. Dairying, Reading (in the Press).Google Scholar
(8) Aubel, & Aubertin, (1927). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 97, 1729.Google Scholar
(9) Knight, & Fildes, (1930). Biochem. J. 24, 1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10) Ingraham, (1933). J. Bad. 26, 573.Google Scholar
(11) Wood, Wood & Baldwin, (1935). J. Bad. 30, 593.Google Scholar
(12) Gillespie, (1936). J. Bad. 31, 101.Google Scholar
(13) Davis, (1936). Proc. Ann. Con. Soc. Agric. Bact.Google Scholar
(14) Edwards, (1932). J. comp. Path. 45, 43 (p. 53).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15) Kluyver, & Hoogerheide, (1936). Proc. Acad. Sci. Amst. 39, 298.Google Scholar
(16) Kluyver, & Hoogerheide, (1936). Enzymologia, 1, 1.Google Scholar
(17) Korr (1935). J. cell. comp. Physiol. 6, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(18) Davis, (1933). Biochem. Z. 265, 90.Google Scholar