Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:29:38.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

168. Bitterness and thinning in canned cream

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. A. Nichols ,
G. R. Howat  and
C. J. Jackson
A. A. Nichols
Affiliation:
From the Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
G. R. Howat
Affiliation:
From the Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
C. J. Jackson
Affiliation:
From the Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Three organisms have been isolated from defective commercially-canned cream which, on inoculation into normal cream, cause bitterness and thinning.

2. These organisms are described and are shown to be strains of B. subtilis. Their spores are capable of withstanding temperatures up to 120°C. for as long as 40 min.

3. The rate of development of bitterness and thinning in experimentally inoculated cans is shown to vary with the culture used and with the temperature of incubation.

4. Both bitterness and thinning are associated with the breakdown of protein, as indicated by determinations of the non-protein nitrogen and of the peptone and subpeptone fractions.

5. The alterations in viscosity do not appear to be due to any fundamental change in the structure of the cream, nor to differences in the degree of clumping of the fat globules.

6. The applications of the results in commercial practice are discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , October 1937 , pp. 331 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Hammer, (1919). Res. Bull. la agric. Exp. Sta. No. 52.Google Scholar
(2) Spitzer, & Epple, (1920). J. Dairy Sci. 3, 486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3) Grindrod, (1928). Canning Age, 9, 692.Google Scholar
(4) Hunziker, & Wright, (1910). Bull. Ind. agric. Exp. Sta.Google Scholar
(5) McMaster (1932–1933). Rep. Fruit Veg. Pres. Sta., Campden, pp. 71–4.Google Scholar
(6) Ford, (1916). J. Bact. 1, 273, 493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7) Gibson, (1937). Proc. Soc. agric. Bad. Edinb.Google Scholar
(8) Sanders, (1923). J. Ass. off. agric. Chem. 16, 140.Google Scholar
(9) Babcock, (1931). Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. No. 249.Google Scholar
(10) Loveless, (1935). Food, 5, 52.Google Scholar